9800X3D releases Nov 7th, review embargo on Nov 6th

Remij

Veteran
AMD released their initial benchmarks during their announcement.

(~8% faster than the 7800X3D across 40+ games tested)
AMD-Ryzen-9-9800X3D-first-party-benchmarks-1.jpg


(~20% faster than the Core Ultra 285K across those same 40+ games, at the time of testing)
AMD-Ryzen-9-9800X3D-first-party-benchmarks-2.jpg



There's some pretty impressive gains in some games relative to the 7800X3D, but also some which really show no improvement at all. Still, this should handily be the best overall gaming processor out there when it releases. Will be interesting to see how these chips overclock due to the change of the 3D V-Cache being under the CCD instead of on top.

I just got my new Mobo and RAM and am ready for the launch on the 7th! :yes:

Went with the MSI X870 Tomahawk Wifi and some G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 6000 CL30
20241104-164800.jpg
 
Ditto. My current 5950x gaming rig is destined to become my next TrueNAS Scale rig, replacing the Sandybridge-era TrueNAS setup I'm currently running. I can't think of a better replacement than a 9800X3D for gaming duties, along with the upcoming RTX 5090, and a big bite of DDR5 :)
 
Checked out the Digital Foundry review. Nice improvement to 1% lows. This CPU is a beast.

Yep. Seems to be clearly the best gaming cpu around. I'm kind of curious about the 9950x3d, or whatever it will be called, because the rumours said it'll have 3d v-cache on both ccus, instead of just one. That could actually mean it's a very viable gaming product. Don't think I'd go that route anyway. Too much power etc.
 
Yep. Seems to be clearly the best gaming cpu around. I'm kind of curious about the 9950x3d, or whatever it will be called, because the rumours said it'll have 3d v-cache on both ccus, instead of just one. That could actually mean it's a very viable gaming product. Don't think I'd go that route anyway. Too much power etc.

If that's really the case, I'll be really torn about whether to replace my 7950X3D to a 9950X3D...
 
I'm still amazed that CPU reviewers don't test "shader precompilation" times as a benchmark. They should make a little suite of games with shader pre-compilation processes and test compile times across multiple CPUs. As more and more games have these processes, it would be good information for gamers to know.. and could very easily sway some people to upgrade or choose a CPU with more cores.

Legitimately, I can't believe nobody is really doing this.
 
Back
Top