Recent content by Dampf

Are the latest UE5.4 features already in Fortnite? Would be cool to see improved performance. Also, maybe we can get a new compiled UE5.4 city sample demo.

The issue was that he didn't benchmark these games against other cards but just showed gameplay footage. Instead, he was benchmarking older cross gen games like Marvels Spider Man, Resi 4, and all the other games that do not make use of modern features which could pull Turing ahead of RDNA1...

I am the one with the agenda? Then tell me, why didn't the channel benchmark the most recent current gen only titles in a video about how the 5700XT performs today? Why does Steve feel the need to constantly tell people how much lower end cards suck at Raytracing despite there existing a ton of...

I can't believe it. Instead of benchmarking the recent interesting games like Alan Wake 2, Avatar, Horizon and Ratchet they just showed a video of the 5700XT did in these titles without benchmarking. Instead, they benchmark the old cross gen games again which we know don't use modern features...

I just arrived at that spot and it completely trashes performance on my system too. Can't hold 30 FPS any longer on my settings. Blizar Prime and the beginning of this planet where you can view all of the impressive geometry at once was completely fine, but for some reason, this specific spot...

Now that is just childish. You've made a great post with solid deducations and deleted it for nothing, just because I have a different opinion of the PC platform as a whole than you and and added another point of how that could correlate to what we're seeing here. We're just interpreting data in...

Or perhaps, it's just a limitation of the PC's memory system. Cyberpunk is a last gen game with last gen assets (RT doesn't change that), so it'd have much less to pull through the PCIe slot. We really need unified memory on PC too. Hopefully Snapdragon will be for Windows what the M1 was for...

Good analysis, so this is what's preventing me from getting 60 FPS. They only should use their shared memory system when the VRAM completely filled up, not when its enough. Hmm. Maybe it's a bug?

Nah. If that were the case, they would have done it. The game is likely not reaching 60 FPS in CPU limit at all. Also remember graphical effects such as Raytracing and high LOD can affect the CPU usage as well. Plus, they're probably doing a ton of simulations and physics.

I have no issues with them targeting 30 FPS at all. But they should be honest, that just a BS excuse. Be honest that you're using the freed frame time budget to improve the visuals and physics simulations. There is no shame in that.

So I am now running my first Nixxes Next Gen Port (Ratchet and Clank) on my old 2060 laptop and I'm pretty impressed how well it handles its video memory management. It seems like instead of completely destroying fps when textures spill into RAM like other games it handles it more gracefully by...

You've misunderstood me. I was not comparing two different projects. I was using the same project with the exact same content displayed and compared r.Nanite.MeshShader 1 and 0. According to Epic, the usage of mesh shader is automated and it will be automatically utilized for geometry bigger...

For clarification, I don't have the technical knowledge to look through the code, but what I have done is experiencing it myself and comparing results. I did open up an UE5 project with Nanite that consisted of a couple of Nanite rendered trees. I've went upclose to the leaves (as I'm aware it...

"the addition of software variable rate shading (VRS) via Nanite compute materials brings substantial performance gains" I can't believe it. Why not use hardware VRS? RTX 2000, RTX 3000, RTX 4000, RX 6000, RX 7000, Xbox Series S, Xbox Series X even down to mobile chips like the latest Adrenos...

What's the reason for Turing's exclusion? Ampere is just a beefed up Turing.