DemoCoder said:
Dave H said:
High-end Italian olive oil imported America isn't the same as high-end Italian olive oil, because the good stuff doesn't make it to America, outside of a few specialty shops. Same with balsamic vinegar; it's almost impossible to find real balsamic (which must be aged a minimum of 18 years) in America. And so on.)
Oh come on. If the nonsense hysteria and pseudo-elitism around "high end" wine culture wasn't bad enough, now we have high-end "Olive Oil", with Olive Oil "tasting", contests, and all of the surrounding wine culture. I suppose good wine doesn't make it to the US either (as if California or Austrailian wines were inferior to French or Italian wines)
Um, did I say that? ...no.
The best California wines are generally accepted to be ahead of the best Italians (and any other regions) and about tied with the best French. They're priced like it, too. I can't comment on whether they deserve it, because I'm not quite able to drop many hundreds of dollars on a bottle of wine (nor am I enough of a wine drinker to appreciate it), but as snobby wine connoisseurs appear to agree on this I'll take their word for it.
And yes, olive oil tastings do exist, in Italy at least. While that's a little silly, having had several different, reasonably fresh, boutique olive oils in Italy (two of them made by people I know), I can tell you that there's a very large, very obvious variety in olive oils, and that some of them taste a lot better and more interesting than Bertolli or anything else you can get in a supermarket in America. (Or in a supermarket in Italy, for that matter.)
It's not that snobby, it's just the truth. And they're not hideously expensive, just impossible to find in America. If you want a better analogy than top wines, I'd compare it more to high-end microbrewed beers. There's a bit of snobbishness involved, perhaps, but many of the taste differences would be obvious to anyone, and the prices involved, if you're local, are not more than about twice what you'd pay for mass-brand decent olive oil. The problem is that, like microbrewed beers, you've got next to no chance of buying it much outside the region of production, much less in another continent.
For that matter, I was considering including in my list the mass-market (in Italy) jars of Sicilian anchovies we used to get, which were utterly fabulous (I'd never been able to eat an anchovy before). Apparently they're available through Dean & Deluca or some such for roughly 20 times the price in Sicily. Is that snobby yuppie fare for New Yorkers? Maybe, yeah. But it's 90 Euro cents a small jar in Sicily.
As for real balsamic vinegar, it's simply a different food from the balsamic vinegar you buy in the US, or in an Italian supermarket for that matter. Instead of a thin liquid it's a thick syrup. It's absurdly expensive, but then you can use a drop or two to flavor an entire dish. And the ways you're meant to use it--on Parmagian cheese, on fresh strawberries, in vanilla ice cream, and, get this, straight from a spoon down the hatch--are completely different from how one uses "balsamic vinegar". They're just different foods. And the point is, what we get in America is not at all the authentic article.
I bet less than 10% of the population could even taste the difference between a $10 olive oil and a $100 olive oil, let alone the difference between a high-end American olive oil and a high-end Italian olive oil. Wine culture has already been embarrassed several times, first, by the inability of French judges to taste the difference between Californian and French wines, and secondly, by the inability of wine critics to detect the difference between a "high end" wine, and two buck chuck.
Again, there is no such thing as $100 olive oil. I'm sure prices get a bit silly when imported in small quantities to the US to sell to yuppies (and/like me), but nowhere near that large. And the differences can be striking. Mostly in an interesting way, not in a wow, this is the most refined and subtle thing I've ever tasted way.
Also, I don't think there
is any American olive oil, at least nothing better than bulk cooking grade. (Or perhaps boutique olive oils, although I haven't heard of it.) Most olive oil comes from Italy, with Spain and Greece the main competition.
As for wine, no one is embarrassed anymore about how good some California wines are, and I sincerely doubt there have been blind tests proving "wine critics" can't tell the difference between good wine and $2 wine, or even $200 wine and $40 wine. There have indeed been blind tests showing that
non-experts can't tell the difference between two vintages of the same wine (or identify which one is supposed to be better). And they were somewhat embarrassing in that most American sommeliers ended up in that "non-expert" category, not much ahead of American yuppies (U of Chicago Club members, I believe it was). French sommeliers, on the other hand, could differentiate quite well. In any case, those are the most "embarrassing" results I've heard of.
I really wish someone like consumer reports would conduct a double blind scientific study of this.
Ok, although until boutique olive oils are more widely available in the US I don't know where they'll get the samples.
I also disagree with pizza issue. I have been to lots of italian restaurants in that serve authentic naples style pizza, not "americanized pizza" Unless I accidently ain't in an American joint in Naples when I was there, or my taste buds suck, I didn't detect too much of a difference. In fact, when I was in Naples, there was a high variation between the pizza I had, some of it awful, some of it good.
Oh, agreed. There's a pizza restaurant on every corner in Italy, and while most of it is alright, most of it isn't amazing either. All of it is relatively distinctive from American pizza, although as I've been arguing not so distinct that they aren't still very close cousins. I wouldn't even go so far as to say that Italian pizza as a whole is better than American pizza as a whole, although some people certainly feel that way.
I dislike cultural elitism and the associated puffery. I mean, why are all the "high end" restaurants French? Why is French associated with fine cuisine and Chinese associated with fast food? There is more variety in Chinese food than French and it tastes better IMHO because it's not greased and sauced up. I spent over $120 per person to eat at "The French Laundry" (the best restaurant in the US) in Sonoma, and while the service was great, and there was a certainly creatively in the dishes (pureed raw fish on an icecream cone made out of potato), I was underwhelmed and though I had better tasting food at a local authentic chinese joint.
Ugh, I'm jealous of you. Well, I'll make it to the French Laundry someday. Meanwhile, I should point out that despite the name it's not exactly "French" (although all the 4 star New York restaurants according to the
New York Times are), certainly not in a traditional way.
And in general I agree with you about Chinese food. But hey--lest you forget, we're talking about
pizza here. I'm sure you wouldn't argue the fact that most Americanized Chinese food is greasy, overfried and not very good. As you said,
authentic ethnic food places can be great.
And that's exactly what I'm talking about--authentic Italian food. But authentic Italian cuisine is simple food that rests on the strength of the ingredients that go in it. Most of the best restaurants in Italy are family-owned places out in the middle of nowhere. Because that's where the food is.
I recently got back from a business trip from London. As always, I went to recommended joints that some Londoners recommended, since of course, "you can get better food in London than in the US". Well guess what, I was equally underwhelmed. Except for Indian food, everything else was mostly the same I get in CA and NY, except that the Mexican was bad compared to CA.
I'm not sure who really thinks London has better high-end (i.e. expensive) food than New York, or even the Bay Area. They have had a couple celebrity chefs of late, but again not really anything to compare to New York. The Indian food's great, though.
People who talk about tasting pesticides, GMO, "organic" produce (e.g. can taste the difference between free range and caged), water the plant was grown with, are mostly talking out of their ass.
Agreed 90%. I absolutely don't agree that "organic" food, much less GM-free food, is inherently any better than food grown with the help of, you know, science. On the other hand, there's a huge and obvious quality difference between cheap mass-produced food and ingredients that are more carefully tended. Unfortunately, oftentimes there is a correlation between modern agricultural techniques and cheap assembly-line ingredients. Plus with produce in particular there's a disconnect between what looks good on a grocery store shelf and what actually tastes good; and the more mass-produced stuff tends to aim for looks (and the ability to keep its looks while in a truck and on a shelf for longer periods of time) while at least some of the "organic" produce is actually bred for taste.
Again, I don't think there's much if any causation there. I'm entirely positive that if higher-end producers would just take advantage of recent breakthroughs in agricultural/food science, they could come up with a better (and cheaper) product. And worst of all, now that "organic" is a mass-market trend, most organic food isn't grown with any more care than normal supermarket food. Certainly the packaged "substituted processed tofu derivatives for all known food items" crap is not only terrible but humorously bad for you as well. (Perhaps the funniest point is that soybeans are the crop most likely to be GM, something like 85% in the US. And even funnier, Europe gets all their soy--which is a lot--from us and Argentina, who also use GM soy. The amount of GM imports that have been kept out of the EU by the moratorium pales in comparison to the amount that have been let in and consumed. (Roundup-ready soy was exempted because it was approved before the moratorium went in place.)
)
Food culture really need a CSICOP debunking like it has done to the paranormal.
I'd love to see that. Food, from agriculture to cooking, is a fascinating and extremely non-trivial blend of biology and chemistry, and it could benefit enormously if more of the food industry took that view of it. Unfortunately about the only ones that do are those in the flavor industry--whose job is to mask the fact that the processed dinners you are eating would literally,
literally taste like cardboard if it weren't for the few ppm of synthesized chemicals they conjure up (and "natural" flavoring is even worse--it's the exact same stuff, only with impurities from industrial leeching proceses to extract from biomass the same chemical they can produce much better in a lab)--and those in corporate agribusiness, who are concerned only with the cheapest possible way to grow things, not the tastiest or healthiest.
If you mean, though, that ingredient quality doesn't matter to final taste, you're totally and completely wrong. Although many dishes and types of food are much more resistent to mediocre ingredient quality than others. (Unfortunately, mainstream American and bourgeois European dishes tend to be the latter. E.g. a big piece of steak or fish. I'm always so impressed and happy with what Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese etc. food can do with some nice cheap little pieces of pork tossed in with some cheap veggies.)