J Josh Newcomer May 30, 2009 #1 480 x 270 with square pixels is a 16:9 aspect ratio. 480 x 272 with square pixels is not a 16:9 aspect ratio (it's actually 30:17, but that's beside the point). So why did Sony choose a resolution that was really close to 16:9, but not actually 16:9?
480 x 270 with square pixels is a 16:9 aspect ratio. 480 x 272 with square pixels is not a 16:9 aspect ratio (it's actually 30:17, but that's beside the point). So why did Sony choose a resolution that was really close to 16:9, but not actually 16:9?
F frogblast Newcomer May 31, 2009 #2 270 is not divisible by eight, while 272 is? Perhaps it has something to do with the available number of line buffers, or whatever. In any case, having 1 pixel of black bar on the top and bottom isn't a big deal when playing 16:9 content.
270 is not divisible by eight, while 272 is? Perhaps it has something to do with the available number of line buffers, or whatever. In any case, having 1 pixel of black bar on the top and bottom isn't a big deal when playing 16:9 content.
B Brad Grenz Philosopher & Poet Veteran May 31, 2009 #3 Probably some artifact of LCD panel production at the time of the original design.
N Npl Veteran May 31, 2009 #4 Caring for exact display aspect rate = pointless. resolution is multiple of 16 = win!!!
S Silent_Buddha Legend Jun 2, 2009 #5 You could just as well ask why some 16:9 720p TV's are 1024x768 resolution. And some are 1366x768 (not exactly 16:9 either with square pixels. ). Regards, SB
You could just as well ask why some 16:9 720p TV's are 1024x768 resolution. And some are 1366x768 (not exactly 16:9 either with square pixels. ). Regards, SB
B Blazkowicz Legend Jun 3, 2009 #6 you can : - scale from HD or SD to 480x272 and not care about 16:9 vs 15.9:9 - scale to 480x270 and not display two line of pixels and not care about them probably doing the first is easier and not wasteful of 960 pixels.
you can : - scale from HD or SD to 480x272 and not care about 16:9 vs 15.9:9 - scale to 480x270 and not display two line of pixels and not care about them probably doing the first is easier and not wasteful of 960 pixels.