Unknown Soldier
Veteran
Do you really? All signs point to 65nm. Not just because low-end parts are 65nm, and RV670 which might a neutered R600 (GTO?) on 65nm in Q3, but also presumably it's coming close enough to EOY (R600 + ~6 months + patented ATi delay = Q4ish) that 65nm is almost a given because of process evolution...I mean, at the very least it's going to be competing with a 65nm GF8 or even GF9. Also, how much more can they do with 80nm? Add anymore anything and that thing is going to need a RIDICULOUS amount of power. We're already seeing 225W for stock, 300w (of connectors) for over clocking; the top of the new PCI-e spec. Anything more could take 375W of connectors, and I personally do not see that happening for that reason amongst others. Not only because having that kind of power requirement is almost commercial suicide because few would have the juice on correct rails/connectors (especially for XFIRE), but because the thing would also be huge, expensive, hot, and competing against a much more lucrative product (a 65nm GF). Couple all this with the fact ATi has said their lineup in 2008 will include 45nm (Which means likely the R700 generation), I think it's a safe assumption to say all roads lead to the high-end refresh being 65nm.
As explained by rwolf, take history into account and we get a resounding 'No' to it being on 65nm.
US