The Best Books You Have Read

This Blinding Absence of Light - Taher Ben Jelloun (translation by Linda Coverdale)

True life account of torture and humiliation after a failed coup by the military in Morroco.
Amazing book.... if you want a glimpse of hell and heaven at the same time, read this.

Axiomatic
- Greg Egan

Read this when I was about 18 years old and it did unhinge my brain a bit. A collection of short stories, based on science with a lot of fiction thrown in.
 
The Republic - Plato
Catch-22
Moby Dick
The Hobbit
It
Dune
Crime and Punishment
A Confederacy of Dunces
Schrodingers Kittens and the Search for Reality
A History of God


Just an interjection, I've seen The Stand mentioned a couple times...I liked that book up until the end, which i felt was one of the most impotent endings in the history of books. Just barely worse than the last 200 pages of Battlefield Earth.
 
Foucault's Pendulum (Umberto Eco)
Surely are you joking Mr. Feynman! (Richard Feynman)
The blind watchmaker (Richard Dawkins)
 
Time to agree with other people!

Adams and Pratchett are must-reads. Who knew how zany British humor could be? Not I, not then. You'd have thought Roald Dahl would've prepared me, but how quickly I forgot. Pratchett probably starts repeating himself after the first twenty books, but the handful I've read have been great. I can see how he's a fantasy Adams and so may not be "great" after Hitchhiker's, but he's still enjoyable.

Hobbit and LotR, sure, but I guess the earlier the better with all fantasy I started with Eddings and Feist and basically ended there). As absorbing as they were, I began to itch toward the end of LotR. It's probably to be expected, reading it all at once. (It's a shame I read Tolkien for the first time right before I saw the movies, though. I watched them through skeptical eyes, good as they were. And Bombadil was missed. They should have worked him in as the ultimate DVD extra.) I'm not sure I'd classify them as best books, though certainly best of class--but that applies to most of my recs. I haven't starting sorting for reals yet.

Oh, Catch-22 & Confederacy of Dunces.

On a more serious note, I'll throw out A Hundred Years of Solitude before someone else does. Plato's dreamy (I was reminded of Gorgias recently). A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich.

nAo, seriously? B/c I finished Foucault's more as a test of will than for enjoyment, it was so dense. It's like The Da Vinci Code (anyone else mention it yet? :devilish: ), but kicked up a few notches. Dry as heck, perhaps explained by his being a professor. Then again, maybe it loses something in translation. I'm looking forward to finishing In the Name of the Rose, though, if only b/c the movie was a pleasant surprise. It's what started my on him, actually. And I've got Baudolino waiting on the shelf ($1 @ BN!).

Thinking back, Siddhartha struck a chord. Of Mice and Men, of course. The Old Man and the Sea & The Sun Also Rises.

I can't remember how much I liked The Fountainhead. Anyway, too prententious a recommendation? :smile: I was pretty psyched when I first read her, but I'm glad I read that before Atlas Shrugged. Not sure I'd recommend the latter; not as a pure novel, anyway.

Guilty pleasures? Clancy and Clavell (the earlier the better, natch). Ooh, and I only recently read Snow Crash and Zodiac and loved them. The Diamond Age, not so much, and I gave up on Cryptonomicon after reading a paragraph-long sentence early on. Like Clancy and Clavell, once they get popular, they get sloppier (and present fine arguments for an editor's worth).

geo, Shakespeare who?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No bashing Shakespeare allowed here! :p

I was going to list Le Mis but thought War and Peace was stuffy enough. Read the latter in high school and absolutely loved it.
 
nAo said:
Foucault's Pendulum (Umberto Eco)
Surely are you joking Mr. Feynman! (Richard Feynman)
The blind watchmaker (Richard Dawkins)

The first one in your list is the one that made me give up reading novel books, when I was 14. I literally threw the book off the window after 40 pages.
 
Pete said:
nAo, seriously? B/c I finished Foucault's more as a test of will than for enjoyment, it was so dense. It's like The Da Vinci Code (anyone else mention it yet? :devilish: ), but kicked up a few notches. Dry as heck, perhaps explained by his being a professor. Then again, maybe it loses something in translation.
Havent't read the english version, I can't imagine how one can translate from italian to another language such a book :)
Anyway.. I'd say that maybe is The Da Vinci's Code that might losely resemble Eco's book, since it was published in the early 80s AFAIK. (but they are very different..)

I'm looking forward to finishing In the Name of the Rose, though, if only b/c the movie was a pleasant surprise. It's what started my on him, actually. And I've got Baudolino waiting on the shelf ($1 @ BN!).
Baudolino is another Eco's experience..you must read it

The first one in your list is the one that made me give up reading novel books, when I was 14. I literally threw the book off the window after 40 pages.
LOL, it's not a book I would recommend to a 14 years old guy.. ;)
I mean, even a lot of adult and educated people just can't read it, it's a matter of tastes in the end.

Marco
 
nAo said:
Havent't read the english version, I can't imagine how one can translate from italian to another language such a book :)
Anyway.. I'd say that maybe is The Da Vinci's Code that might losely resemble Eco's book, since it was published in the early 80s AFAIK. (but they are very different..)


Baudolino is another Eco's experience..you must read it


LOL, it's not a book I would recommend to a 14 years old guy.. ;)
I mean, even a lot of adult and educated people just can't read it, it's a matter of tastes in the end.

Marco

Now, that I'm 31, I still think it is atrocious...but in the end, what do I know? A poet I am, that and nothing more...
 
Crisidelm said:
The first one in your list is the one that made me give up reading novel books, when I was 14. I literally threw the book off the window after 40 pages.
ROFL! A bit of poetic license, maybe, that last part, but I can easily accept it as the truth. My sympathies.

nAo, I thought you were Italian, but couldn't trust my backstabbing memory. I can't tell from the translation if he's a gifted writer, but I can surely pick up on his style, and it's pretty close to stream-of-consciousness historical digressions as I've come. It's definitely a different experience (challenge may be more accurate) than Da Vinci, but I saw a number of similar themes. I happened to read it soon after Da Vinci.
 
Isn't Eco the guy that when asked why he wrote "The Name of the Rose", replied, "Because I wanted to murder a monk"? :LOL:
 
I reread the now somewhat dated Holy Blood Holy Grail that I had read 20+ years ago after I read both Dan Brown's books (Angel and Demons being quite a bit better than DaVincy Code)... still somewhat relevant even when you add the info that debunks part of the story about the illegal industrial scale selling of Masses that Sauniere engaged in and which accounts for pretty much his entire wealth. Something well known in France but not well disseminated in the English world... Gonna pick up Michael Baigent's latest 'Jesus Papers' probly next week who is one of the 3 authors of HBHG...

Another good speculative alternate history\prehistory is the latest in a series by Graham Hancock. Some good and interesting info in his latest called Supernatural'...

By no means the best books Ive read but since theyve already been listed (save french books) I thought Id list my next in the series :)....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pete said:
ROFL! A bit of poetic license, maybe, that last part, but I can easily accept it as the truth. My sympathies.

Believe it or not, I really did it...the book fell into the backyard, then I went to pick it up and put it back in its place (a massive AND resistant book it was) for I didn't want my father to realize what I did, as he's quite a fan of Eco.
 
Crisidelm said:
Believe it or not, I really did it...the book fell into the backyard, then I went to pick it up and put it back in its place (a massive AND resistant book it was) for I didn't want my father to realize what I did, as he's quite a fan of Eco.

Heh, reminds of when, back in 1980, my best friend Scott Schnegelburger chucked my first edition Dungeon Master's Guide out his second-floor bedroom window because I'd just killed his orc fighter. :p
 
pcchen said:
The Hobbit and the LOTR trilogy are too long for me.
Simon F said:
Too long? I wanted it to keep going.
I read LOTR towards the end of my teenage years (I'm 31 now, so that means about 10-12 years ago). My comment in my original post on this book was based on my memory of my reaction then. Granted that during that time I probably was more interested in getting into some girl's (and later, boy's) pants and therefore probably did not appreciate what you and a million others appreciated about this book (or these 3 books, so to speak). I do remember that when I read the book (a single 1992 Grafton that incorporated all three books in one), I was more impressed with the 120 (or so) pages of the various appendixes -- it made me realize how much work went into it... I mean, Tolkien created a language, fer Chrissakes!).

But I did not find LOTR that interesting. It certainly wasn't a page turner as far as I can remember (and I don't mean this in the Dan Brown suspense way) because Tolkien just didn't make me want to read on. This criteria is the sole reason why I have that list of mine, books that intrigued me enough to make me want to continue reading even if it mean only 2-3 hours of sleep every night.

I suppose the reason for this post of mine is to ask why a critic (as listed on the back page of the Grafton version I have) would write :

The English-speaking world is divided into those who have read LOTR and The Hobbit and those who are going to

I assume you (and many many others) can provide the answer :)
 
"The English-speaking world is divided into those who have read LOTR and The Hobbit and those who are going to".
No way, José.
 
For all it's worth, LOTR is the one and only book i started but never finished. I ALWAYS finish my books, but that one, i just couldn't...
 
The problem with you guys is that you probably read/started reading LOTR and Hobbit too late, after you saw loads of likewise literature and junk movies. Or these have spoiled your appetite, whatever. In itself, these are a very nice piece of literature.
 
Back
Top