What's your take on the issue?
Can SCO win even if there is suspicious code in Linux? Is IBM at last getting steamed up to strike back, big time? Did the SMP & NUMA code in Linux come from SGI? Is it all a plan by Microsoft to use SCO to undermine GPL? Or is it just stock manipulation by SCO management? Or a real IP protection case, with honest motives by SCO? Are TiVos an endangered species now? Are there too many SCO stories on Slashdot?
Free speculation welcomed!
(I thought of posting this on Software Talk, but this issue has so much legalese involved that this is probably the proper forum. And apologies if I missed an earlier thread on this.)
Can SCO win even if there is suspicious code in Linux? Is IBM at last getting steamed up to strike back, big time? Did the SMP & NUMA code in Linux come from SGI? Is it all a plan by Microsoft to use SCO to undermine GPL? Or is it just stock manipulation by SCO management? Or a real IP protection case, with honest motives by SCO? Are TiVos an endangered species now? Are there too many SCO stories on Slashdot?
Free speculation welcomed!
(I thought of posting this on Software Talk, but this issue has so much legalese involved that this is probably the proper forum. And apologies if I missed an earlier thread on this.)
