Well it seems Matt C from IGN was getting attacked for his articles regarding SK and Factor 5. Well he decided to reply back to those that were being nasty to him, and he provided a little info regarding Factor 5's future as well.
Well hopefully Matt's last comment will settle any thoughts on exactly what he meant.
Hey guys,
There is a difference between breaking a news story and reactionary reporting. I broke the Nintendo/Silicon Knights split story. I was the first person to get wind of it and to call Denis on it. He confirmed it for me, I called Nintendo and got an official statement, and the story went up.
No offense to GameSpot -- it's a great site -- but this was not a Nintendo news release and I guarantee you that if I did not write the story first you would not hear about it until E3. What you saw on GameSpot and every other site out there was a follow-up story to news that I broke. It wasn't a matter of me posting a press release before someone else. It was a matter of me breaking the news. Exactly the same can be said of the Factor 5 story.
It's a lot easier to call up a developer/publisher after the fact for a few additional quotes than it is to break the news to begin with.
I'm sorry if you didn't like my angle, but my slants are based on personal insight I have into the development futures of each company. I'm not trying to create false hope for you.
Cheers.
Matt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And just now:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Maybe Matt should focus more on reporting things CORRECTLY rather then trying to get the news out first."
My stories are correct. Perhaps you should read them before you make stupid comments.
I've been following Factor 5 a long time and am a big fan of the company. If you think its next game is a Nintendo one, you're in for a huge disappointment. You can believe whatever you like, but my story is the most accurate one out there and that is the whole truth.
Matt
Well hopefully Matt's last comment will settle any thoughts on exactly what he meant.