We should get some info much sooner. There are some NDA slides flying around, which will be public very soon :smile:
Things are not looking good according to Kyle@Hardocp who has said that we won`t see GT300 in retail in following 4-6 months.
We should get some info much sooner. There are some NDA slides flying around, which will be public very soon :smile:
A 512b sku down to 384b makes sense only from a (lower cost) PCB perspective I guess. But I still dont understand how that helps Nvidia make it to the market quicker than the 512b sku? The highest priority right now is time to market, performance I'm guessing should be there unless something went horribly wrong.The rumor in that former link was speaking of a 512SP/384bit chip with the 512bit chip following later on. If true that would suggest a high end chip with castrated ROP partitions and not a performance GPU.
Albeit frankly yes ROPs might take up quite some die area but I can't figure out why theoretically 6 out of 8 partitions would make such a big difference to yields.
Good enough doesnt really sound good to be honest. R520 came three months later with a 10-15% boost, which quite simply was not enough.Of course would they have to have a significant lead; I just don't know or pretend to know (which is quite a popular trend lately during silly season *cough*) what the case exactly is. Now let's give the former rumor and the above thought a nice logical chain to follow: it sounds like a relatively bandwidth starved solution to me which could be good enough to surposs the competition's performance GPU by a good enough but not the best enough margin.
Which would theoritically quite a leap from Cypress, granted but I recall AMD having a similar advantage current generation and yet it didnt pay off. I dont think this is anywhere as critical to boost the sales if the gaming perf isnt there.The maximum peak double precision throughput of a 5870 is at 544GFLOPs/s according to AMD itself.
How about the average of the two? 500mm2.The scenario isn't even plausible from the get go in my mind. It could be some el weirdo test/dev sample like you can find from about any IHV before each launch, it could be a chip that is meant for a dual chip SKU, it could be some false translation, or Lord knows what else. Shall I remind you how specs for Cypress fluctuated until they finally came to the light of day? It nearly sounded like a rubber chip that you can stretch into all 4 directions.
So the die area D12U is supposed to consume varies between 452 and 576mm2.
Wasnt this faked by some user who later owned up to it?Like the one from AMD for the Evergreen launch or an even older one:
http://users.otenet.gr/~ailuros/evergr.pdf
Link please? Next up Kyle would have got this information from a faulty translator.Things are not looking good according to Kyle@Hardocp who has said that we won`t see GT300 in retail in following 4-6 months.
Ooooh, I like those kind. Feel free to PM them to me.They're fluffy AND juicy.
Got a link? Not that I doubt you, I just hate hunting for it.Things are not looking good according to Kyle@Hardocp who has said that we won`t see GT300 in retail in following 4-6 months.
CUDA isn't an non-existent market, it's just a hella lot smaller than the gaming market.Seems they aimed much effort at nonexistent markets... Anyway, slides are one thing, reality another
Anyone know any female nVidia reps? I don't off hand.Nvidia has been VERY tight lipped about GT300 and for good reason I can assure you, these specs are within what I have been hinted towards from my Nvidia rep.
She is very excited about this product, the way she has been talking is that Nvidia is going to let ATi get comfortable with all the good press they are getting, and then they are going to drop the hammer with an amazing product line that is going to not only steal ATI's thunder, but put them to shame as well.
The thing she said that got me the most excited was exactly this "Nvidia has held absoultely NOTHING back this go around, they are giving GT300 Enthusiast cards everything they've got"
OMG, sorry for the topic combo breaker...but at one of the links from one of these posts I found this in the thread (and the original poster linked/quoted Arty which I really loved):
Anyone know any female nVidia reps? I don't off hand.
Thanks for the [H] links guys, gonna go check them now and try and figure out if nVidia is holding some killer cards in their hand or bluffing themselves into a hole.
We should get some info much sooner. There are some NDA slides flying around, which will be public very soon :smile:
My entire computer is very little more than a gaming accelerator ... hell if we ignore FaH&Co for a moment gaming is probably the only thing which stresses the computer for 99% of us.MORE MORE than only a gaming accelerator.
I would love to, but sorry don't have access to said slides. I know I just broke your heart.Ooooh, I like those kind. Feel free to PM them to me.
You mean Nvidia has been holding back until now?The thing she said that got me the most excited was exactly this "Nvidia has held absoultely NOTHING back this go around, they are giving GT300 Enthusiast cards everything they've got"
You mean Nvidia has been holding back until now?
A 512b sku down to 384b makes sense only from a (lower cost) PCB perspective I guess. But I still dont understand how that helps Nvidia make it to the market quicker than the 512b sku? The highest priority right now is time to market, performance I'm guessing should be there unless something went horribly wrong.
Good enough doesnt really sound good to be honest. R520 came three months later with a 10-15% boost, which quite simply was not enough.
Which would theoritically quite a leap from Cypress, granted but I recall AMD having a similar advantage current generation and yet it didnt pay off. I dont think this is anywhere as critical to boost the sales if the gaming perf isnt there.
How about the average of the two? 500mm2.
They've been holding back on DX10.1, 40 nm and GDDR5 at least
That's the sad reality that the truth usually lies in the middle. Take neliz's prediction that it'll be by only 20% than X as worst case scenario and NV's own bullshit exaggerations stir them slightly and there you have your coffee coloured performance estimate
You mean we should start calling it GF380? 8)What GTX 380?