NITRO!?!

The radeon 9700 can do more than 22000.
3dmark 2001 is a pointless benchmark...
I dont understand why they dont make 1600x1200 standard for the scores.
It would make a litle more sense then...
 
Well why would Nitro be a surprise? I mean they already had "TNT". Although ironically TNT is a more advanced form of explosive than Nitroglycerin. They should have started out with Nitro, then moved on to Dynamite and finally TNT. ;)
 
were original Detonator-s released for TNT or was it for GeForce ?
obviously, your average detonator will not work with something so powerful as Deuterium :eek:
 
Maybe they should just name it BIG FART...... because this whole NV30 thing just plain smells bad! :rolleyes:
 
'course Napalm has poor connetations now :)

As for double the power - as we all know this is like any other PR claim, if I were ATI i would be capitalising on those situations were the 9700 is 2.5-3 times the 4600 :rolleyes:
 
no_way said:
were original Detonator-s released for TNT or was it for GeForce ? obviously, your average detonator will not work with something so powerful as Deuterium :eek:

Yes, the original Det's were released for the TNT. Their primary benefit, at the time, was the inclusion of 3DNow! optimizations for K6-2 CPUs. Before these drivers, 3dfx cards were really the only viable choice for those with AMD's processors.
 
Chalnoth said:
no_way said:
were original Detonator-s released for TNT or was it for GeForce ? obviously, your average detonator will not work with something so powerful as Deuterium :eek:

Yes, the original Det's were released for the TNT. Their primary benefit, at the time, was the inclusion of 3DNow! optimizations for K6-2 CPUs. Before these drivers, 3dfx cards were really the only viable choice for those with AMD's processors.

I remember that well. ACE's hardware had quite a good review where socket 7 owners were shown the V3 was their best upgrade perfromance wise.
 
Back
Top