mckmas8808
Legend
<nu>faust said:8088 , i really dont understand why arent you trying so hard not to see my point. what i'm saying is there is not much difference between a late 2006 release and an early 2007 one ,and you still continue saying ppl were wrong when they said mgs was a 2007 release.
scooby_dooby said:Who knows what'll happen, but based on their past history it doesn't get any better then the pre-release trailers they show. I think they've set a very high goal for themselves as it is, and if really aiming for a 2006 launch I think they'll struggle just to produce an equal level of quality, let alone improve it.
You guys are not looking at the facts. A 2006 game is a 2006 game. I know there's not a real difference between late 2006 and early 2007, yet November or December of 2006 is NOT 2007. So yes if the game comes out in December of next year that means it's NOT of 2007. Which also means the people saying this game will be a 2007 would be wrong. You can't change facts.
And to Scooby, Kojima himself said that the game will look better than what we seen.
IGN said:The shots revealed in the magazine are images running on actual PS3 hardware, and as impressive as they are, they will get better, according to Kojima's comments.
So tell me again why you think MGS4 won't look better than what we seen. MGS2 looked better than the first ever viewings of it too.