memory req. for SMOOTHVISION 2.0

tb said:
Okay, I would say issue cleared. They only save bandwidth, point. Send ATi a mail, no answer, but I'll wait. Thanks guxs for the clarification on this issue.

Thomas
Click to expand...
who do you think openGl Guy works for?
You've been talking to ATI this whole thread...
 
Althornin said:
tb said:
Okay, I would say issue cleared. They only save bandwidth, point. Send ATi a mail, no answer, but I'll wait. Thanks guxs for the clarification on this issue.

Thomas
Click to expand...
who do you think openGl Guy works for?
You've been talking to ATI this whole thread...
Click to expand...
Whoa now... I work for ATi, but I only speak for me. However, I am happy to clear up misconceptions when I can :)
 
OpenGL guy said:
Whoa now... I work for ATi, but I only speak for me. However, I am happy to clear up misconceptions when I can :)
Click to expand...
Of course.
I just meant that you were a guy "who would know" :)
 
OpenGL guy said:
Plus, without reading the specs on TREC, it sounds like each block will compress to a different size, meaning that the starting address of the next block will be unknown without first looking at the previous block. This is not acceptable for random access.
Click to expand...
I think TREC may have had an LUT to find the location of each block.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top