Most people buy things to keep them and having to delete to make room for new stuff and then redownload the old before being able to watchh again is a bother.
How much is a high-download high-speed internet service in the states per month?
In Australia I'm paying $79 for 1.5MBit @ 40GB/month. A HD movie download service just wouldn't work with those sort of limits. I don't understand how this can take off, unless your infrastructure is just so much better.
Is the movie D/L service available with Live Silver? I think that would be a stronger sales point than anything else... however non of things compare with On demand movie services from cable companies - no wait and HD...
Huh? How is there no wait?
The only true on demand video is when you download it yourself. That will always involve some lag time.
Unless Comcast like, preloads the beginning of all the movies to a big HDD in your box. Not sure how that would work. And it couldn't be unlimited either (maybe they'd have room to preload the top 100 titles or something?).
Plus they'd be chewing up your BW with background dling all the time, or maybe, they're bandwidth since they're probably your ISP as well
Hah, I remember what sad hack they used to pass off as on demand video years ago, they'd have a few new releases runningconcurrently on various scrambled channels at staggered start times, and you'd pay 3.95 or whatever to unscramble the next start time up, which hopefully would be just 30 minutes or less away.
Hm I wasn't aware there was only a rental option. I thought there were both varieties available rental AND purchase. I haven't actually tried it myself. I prefer having a hardcopy on my shelf rather than just data stored on a harddrive.but its still a *rental* service at *rental* prices, and legitimate purchasers of the rental service should not be surprised that they don't have unlimited ability to keep content forever at those prices.
Most broadband in the US is not going to have download limits on it. Many ISPs do reserve the right to limit heavy, heavy users, but this seems to happen in real life more on an anecdotal basis ("Yeah, my buddy's cousin. . .") than to people you actually know. EDIT: It also seemed to happen more frequently 4 or 5 years back when broadband was still rolling out.
Good point.I wonder how much of the 'success' of these movie/TV downloads on 360 could be contributed to easy usage as apposed to what PC users have to go with with many standards, options, providers, etc.
Stand-alone is relatively fair game, but I've grown weary of installing even more shit and more backdoors on the Windows PC. Those things were once meant to get stuff done after all, and not all of the files on there are worthless junk.Variety article linked in the OP said:Many in Hollywood had high expectations that Amazon's strength in DVD sales would spur the nascent Web download biz. But the Netco faces the same problems as competitors such as Movielink, CinemaNow, Guba and AOL that launched before it: It's difficult for consumers to burn downloads onto DVD (save for a few titles on CinemaNow), and it's tricky for all but the most tech-savvy to watch downloads on a TV.
I just switched from Freedom 2 Surf with a 2 GB/m limit (now upped to 5 GB) to Tiscali which is uncapped. Most places seem to offer a 40 GB limit pm. Also 2 Mb/s is the usual in the UK. There's some 8 Mb/s rollout, but it has terrible penetration. Same with cable TV too. UK is very backwardConsider yourself lucky, here in the UK every ISP I can think of has a cap on how much you can download per month, and there are no signs of that changing - If anything, the caps are being tightened all the time.
Blockbuster, Hollywood Video, and Netflix would be amused to hear their business model is not tenable. Tho I suspect they are much less amused by the competition that mass digital delivery of entirely legal and legitimate content is going to increasingly provide.
But, sure, that HD is a bit of an albatross for this kind of thing. It'd be better if it was bigger, but its still a *rental* service at *rental* prices, and legitimate purchasers of the rental service should not be surprised that they don't have unlimited ability to keep content forever at those prices.
Personally, I think the movie theatres are liable to be out of business in ten years, which after the boom in construction of them in the last 15 years is going to mean a huge amount of commercial real estate becoming empty. . . .