pretty much.
GeForce 8800 Human Head demo available
- Thread starter SlmDnk
- Start date
pretty much.
santyhammer
Newcomer
Can't wait to see the HumanHeadDemoTeamSecrets.ppt... Any idea when is going to be released? 
There is a short video showing the texture-space lighting they used ( like The Matrix Reloaded agent Smith ) and talking about they use like 23-50 SSS offscreen passes rendered to a texture!
There is a short video showing the texture-space lighting they used ( like The Matrix Reloaded agent Smith ) and talking about they use like 23-50 SSS offscreen passes rendered to a texture!
Last edited by a moderator:
Love_In_Rio
Veteran
Wasn't this what they promised with the ill-fated NV30 back in the days?
Real-time cinematic and life-like rendering...can't remember the exact quote but it was something along those lines
50 Jurasic Park dinossaurs in real time!
I doubt it would be much different from the advanced skin pdf that was released for Adrianne.Can't wait to see the HumanHeadDemoTeamSecrets.ppt... Any idea when is going to be released?
There is a short video showing the texture-space lighting they used ( like The Matrix Reloaded agent Smith ) and talking about they use like 23-50 SSS offscreen passes rendered to a texture!
[Brick_top]
Newcomer
How good it would be if it could move as good as it looks? Seems impressive to me.
Seems impressive to me.Looks really nice but I don't think this is something we'll see looking good in motion for a while.
It's a 3d head scan, I'm guessing by http://www.xyzrgb.com/
Anything with textures and geometry scanned from real life is going to look pretty damn good, regardless of the lighting and shaders.
If they can do that visual quality on an animated face while the character moves around a fully dynamically lit scene then I'll be truly impressed.
It's a 3d head scan, I'm guessing by http://www.xyzrgb.com/
Anything with textures and geometry scanned from real life is going to look pretty damn good, regardless of the lighting and shaders.
If they can do that visual quality on an animated face while the character moves around a fully dynamically lit scene then I'll be truly impressed.
jimmyjames123
Regular
I wonder if it will be Jen Hsun's face that NV shows when they are able to show this level of detail with eyes and hair running at adequate framerates on consumer hardware
Or maybe it should actually be Erik Lindholm
Or maybe it should actually be Erik Lindholm
i agree, theres some terrible stuff there
look at the cheesy glow around the head
the only reasonable shadows (should be nearly perfect)
i admit its very nice but for as a showcase for the top of the range card (by ppl that know it intimately) its not wow.
something along the lines of toystory like graphics i think
TechReport says it also runs on GF7:
http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/12533
http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/12533
It runs on my 6800GT with FW160.02 & 158.27, but not really. Here can you see:
GPU idles, so it is full cpu-processed.
what do you think about my implementation running on geffo 5 and up?
if you like it i can post executable
Please, if you wouldn't mind :smile:
Sorry, it's not subsurface scattering, it's a fake.
Although it looks good, just not as good as the real deal (with raytracing and all). There's plenty of info about their method, it basically renders the lighting into a texture, blurs it in image space a few times using some extra parameters, combines it together and then uses this to light the face. It's a development on the Ruby skin shader from that old ATI demo.
Real SSS would give you transparent ears, for example, like this:
http://graphics.ucsd.edu/~henrik/papers/spectral_skin_shading/spectral_skin_shading.jpg
Either you're not serious, or you haven't seen any good offline renders... Even Gollum looked way better than this and that was in 2002.
Some quick examples:
http://www.subdivme.com/sebscorner/data/Dussel_fin.jpg
http://www.subdivme.com/Images/wip/Hoy_BoyWithAnAttitude.jpg
http://www.subdivme.com/Images/wip/ShadingWip.jpg
http://www.subdivme.com/Images/Natalie.jpg
http://www.subdivme.com/Images/wip/ClintBW.jpg
http://features-temp.cgsociety.org/gallerycrits/148983/148983_1162651093_large.jpg
hesido
Regular
Why should I not be serious? I have said it's *comparable and better than many* offline renders, not all. I have been a cgtalk member for many years now and believe me I have seen enough renders, I have seen those links you sent save a few. (Thanks for reminding anyway, they are really cool
)Please do appreciate what is being done for a change!