I found this article interesting, IIRC we had a similar debate here with regards to the new European constitution.
http://www.nationalpost.com/commentary/story.html?id=0D419A96-F4B3-48F4-901B-A4DC96D55150
Yet Europe's politicians are notably failing to tackle these deep-seated and fundamental problems. Indeed, at the recent European Union summit in Greece, they unanimously agreed to make most of these problems worse by adopting a new Constitution for the European Union that will actually entrench some of the policies causing them.
For instance, the draft constitution will establish a European Bill of Rights. As commentator Iain Murray points out, however, whereas the U.S. Bill of Rights restrains the federal government, its European imitator confers vast and dangerously vague powers on the EU's centralized bureaucracy. It does so by granting what are misleadingly called "positive" rights -- i.e., the right to a job, the right to a "free job placement service" and a whole wish list of labour union demands.
These rights would give the Brussels bureaucracy free license to intervene across the continent to regulate and re-regulate its already sclerotic labour market. One leading German politician lamented that if the constitution were adopted, it would make permanent the very regulations that are slowing down the German economy -- and which even Germany's socialist chancellor is now seeking to amend or repeal.
Any notion of democratic control by the citizenry is rendered still more difficult by two further factors. First, the constitution is almost flagrantly undemocratic -- the only body that can propose and initiate legislation is the unelected EU Commission. In effect, this body of 30 commissioners, all appointed by governments like ordinary bureaucrats, would wield an "advance veto" on new laws. The most that the European "parliament" can do is to reject those commission proposals that it doesn't like. Voters cannot throw the rascals out because they don't choose them in the first place.
In short, the constitution gives the new European state more powers to regulate the lives of its citizens while making it virtually impossible for those citizens to control the actions of the government through the traditional democratic process. This is a charter for bureaucracy. What is proposed is not a people's Europe but a politicians' Europe.
It might be supposed, therefore, that the politicians would be unable to persuade their voters to accept it -- and The Economist magazine, usually a strong supporter of European integration, has called on them either to radically amend the draft or throw it out altogether. But the politicians are very unlikely to do either -- because they are afraid that if they unpick even a single strand of the carefully agreed draft, the entire thing would unravel. And because it is, after all, a politicians' Europe.
http://www.nationalpost.com/commentary/story.html?id=0D419A96-F4B3-48F4-901B-A4DC96D55150