I'm surpised that no one has said anything about what happens at 1:18 in the video. The 360 seems to use textures there for the snow while the PS3 uses something else.
Ugg. The video in their comparison is so compressed that it's difficult to make any judgment. It does look the the blocking is worse on the PS3 side as well. It's hard to make a conclusive statement about the bumps in the scarf because I can easily image the detail has been filtered out during the capture/encode. Still, the fact remains that in motion (and the game moves really fast!) it's all but impossible to see any difference. Both versions look great and seem to run well. Well done, Capcom.
I'm surpised that no one has said anything about what happens at 1:18 in the video. The 360 seems to use textures there for the snow while the PS3 uses something else.
I'm surpised that no one has said anything about what happens at 1:18 in the video. The 360 seems to use textures there for the snow while the PS3 uses something else.
Is that particles I spy the PS3 using?......
Or am I thinking of something else.
Is that particles I spy the PS3 using?......
Or am I thinking of something else.
Yes, both versions display the snow via some kind of particle system... as hundreds of other games. Or maybe you had in mind some special, Cell-only, processor power hungry particles?
there's no big difference. some previews did say the controls for the 360 version are a little harder/have a longer learning curve which should be expected because the game was made around the dualshock controller. I'd wait for a demo (which I think Capcom said there will be).
How is that so? Both controllers have the same amount of buttons.
The series was designed for a dualshock
I suppose you've never heard of demo's or gameplay videos? You also don't have to have played a game to see the start of positive buzz.
I can point you to numerous threads where people are talking about the expectations of forthcoming releases. I always discuss with friends what games we're going to buy and we want to buy the same ones if they are multiplayer.
If you think word of mouth doesn't sell games, you are just misinformed. You can argue about the amount and what factor may lead to the best benefit, but the fact is that word of mouth sells some games.
All you are going to get is anecdotal evidence. Even million dollar market studies couldn't give you hard numbers.
No more than you were trying to insult Joker, so I guess you'll have to decide if it was an insult.
Perhaps you could point it out to me.
Yes, this is called: "smart PR".
So you're actually supporting my point.
People have only the information the game publisher wants them to have.
They have all the information only after actually playing it.
This is a PR product. It doesn't have word "public" in it for nothing, you know.
Carefully crafted marketing and PR sells games.
So?
It was an insult, will you apologize then?
I can even repeat the key points:
- PR sells games
- You need to do business different to stand out
- You need not do business too different or you'll be feared
You might want to go back and read the thread to see what you actually posted.