Beyond3D's GT200 GPU and Architecture Analysis

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Arun, Jun 16, 2008.

  1. ChrisRay

    ChrisRay <span style="color: rgb(124, 197, 0)">R.I.P. 1983-
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,234
    Likes Received:
    26
    Eventually Nvidia will support all DX10 Geforce hardware.
     
  2. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    You won't even have to do that. A simple manual install via the device manager is enough.
     
  3. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    #163 Unknown Soldier, Jun 21, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 21, 2008
  4. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    Read somewhere, but source seems not to be avaible now:
    GTX 250: 160SP/48TMU/24ROP, 768MB/384-Bit, G200-90, PCB P667
    GTX 270: GTX 280 with lower frequency, G200B-300

    Start should be soon and prices should be comparable to new HD4800.
     
  5. Twinkie

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    5
    55nm? already?

    That being said, is the GTX moniker equivalent to AMD's HD 4850 moniker? So no more GTs, GS, etc.
     
  6. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,119
    Location:
    New York
    I'll believe that when somebody explains how a 6 cluster part can have 160 SPs ;)
     
  7. MfA

    MfA
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    7,610
    Likes Received:
    825
    How soon?
     
  8. A.L.M.

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Looking for a place to call home
    160SP it's simply not possible with the current NV architecture. 144SP or 168SP. Actually, judging from the reviews of HD4870, I think that the only thing that NV really needs right now is 55nm parts, to speed up clocks and recover some missing performance pieces, and to cut costs.
    They need something to match HD4870 at its price point, not something below, where there is still plenty of offerings...
    Anyway I still think that a 144SP gpu is possible, because they thought that such a card could be enough to match a HD4870. Bad guess, I suppose. :lol:
     
  9. Hanners

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2002
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    England
    No, GTX denotes enthusiast parts, so we'll be seeing other titles used for mid-range and value parts.
     
  10. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    http://hkepc.com/?id=1321&fs=c1hh
    :wink:

    Indeed, original source seems INQ, but the article is not foundable, only a to German machine translation in a Chinese forum. :lol:

    I would think it could be a 7 Cluster part: 56TMU/168SPs with GTX 260 clocks, what should end up slightly over HD4850.
     
  11. pjbliverpool

    pjbliverpool B3D Scallywag
    Legend

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    9,237
    Likes Received:
    4,260
    Location:
    Guess...
    Thats really excellent. Best product naming scheme in ages.
     
  12. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    Gtx 290?;)

    Gtx 280: Gt200-300
    Gtx 260: Gt200-100
     
  13. Twinkie

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    5
    GTX260 $349
    GTX280 drops to $449~499?
    GTX290 $649?

    I wish they drop the ridiculous price tag for the GTX280s though. On a side note, just how much can they reduce the price of GTX260 seeing as the HD4870 is faster.
     
  14. jimmyjames123

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    3
    The GTX 280 and GTX 260 really need to be transitioned to 55nm with higher clocks to be competitive in price/performance ratio.

    Also, hopefully NVIDIA will prepare for the fact that AMD can potentially release two high end cards, "4850 X2" in the $400-$500 range, and "4870 X2" in the $500-$600 range.
     
  15. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    I don't think two AMD X2 would make much sense given it's the same chip underneath. Yeah, its possible, but I don't know that I see it when traditional crossfire can fill in the holes.
     
  16. jimmyjames123

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    3
    It would be just like comparing 4850 Xfire for $400 vs 4870 Xfire for $600, but with two dies on one card. There is still a big enough difference in price and performance between 4870, 4850 Xfire, and 4870 Xfire that it makes sense to sell a 4850 X2 to fill another high end price point with the 4870 X2. So the 4870 X2 would have the highest performance and highest price ($500-$600 range), while the 4850 X2 would have higher performance and price compared to a single 4870. The Xfire systems with two separate cards would then be marketed as an upgrade path for anybody further down the road.

    So the lineup would look like this:

    $599 4890 1024 MB GDDR5 (= "4870 X2")
    $449 4880 1024 MB GDDR3 (= "4850 X2")
    $299 4870 512 MB GDDR5
    $199 4850 512 MB GDDR3

    with each card having the ability to be used in CrossfireX.

    Most people with money who are looking at the ultra high end segment would prefer having one multi die card vs two single die cards, assuming that price and performance is similar between the two. Also, it would be much more palatable to use "4850 X2" in CrossfireX than having to buy four 4850 in a quad CrossfireX setup.
     
    #176 jimmyjames123, Jun 25, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 26, 2008
  17. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    edit: opps, forgot, this is a GT200 thread.
     
  18. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    Well, this is the GT200 thread so let's keep the AMD neepery to a minimum.
     
  19. jimmyjames123

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    3
    Oops, sorry.

    So there will be more GT200 architectural analysis coming up from Rys, correct?
     
  20. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    You mean RV770? Hopefully in the next few days.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...