http://www.clubic.com/t/screenshot92217.html
Anyone here on Beyond can make the traduction of the comments?
RainZ
Anyone here on Beyond can make the traduction of the comments?
RainZ
DaveBaumann said:ATI have also stated that they won't do SM3.0 in calender 2004 so R480 (as expected, really) looks to be a clock bumped R420.
PatrickL said:In the same article they say that R 500 and NV 50 are expected first half of 2005 and should be on 0.09 .
DaveBaumann said:Well, can't read Japanese
According to the label, the R410 is to be a middle-range part (no, I don't read much Japanese, but it said, "middle range" phoenetically in the box), so it doesn't count as an "RV" part. It also says "8 pixel pipe" for these, with "4 pixel pipe" for the "value range" NV44 and RV370.Hyp-X said:Well if R500 is really 90nm 05 spring, then I'd except R(V)410 to be 90nm as well.
that's what I was expecting too ....... although I wouldn't be surprized if NVIDIA accelerated their schedule after seeing all those "r500 is coming significantly earlier than expected" rumorsMegadrive1988 said:I'd expect R500 around the summer or early fall and NV50 late fall or early winter late 2005
The R9600 Pro/XT (RV350/360) weren't middle-range? Nor the R7500 (RV200)?Chalnoth said:According to the label, the R410 is to be a middle-range part, so it doesn't count as an "RV" part.
Chalnoth said:According to the label, the R410 is to be a middle-range partHyp-X said:Well if R500 is really 90nm 05 spring, then I'd except R(V)410 to be 90nm as well.
Could be that, or it could be related to shader throughput.DaveBaumann said:"Twice the efficiency" (not twice the speed) seems like they are making some updates to the bandwidth routines.