Any info on the 6800NU?

Cali3350

Newcomer
I was honestly expecting to see it today :(

I cant pay $500 for a video card, and even if i could, with an Athlon XP 2600+ i wouldnt use that power anyway. My 9700Pro is getting a little long in the tooth, as evidenced by FarCry (Medium settings give me 2x FPS of very high settings, so its not CPU limited). the 6800NU is looking worse then i was expecting though (12x1 with less then 400mhz core?)

Im depressed. Anyone know any info on when it will lauch, clocks, ANYTHING?
 
This is my major disappointment as well. I figured the only card that would be benched was the ultra, but I was hoping for details on all configurations.

All we know at this time is that the Non-U will have 128 MB DDR-1, and 12 pipes. Clock speeds of both core and memory are completely unknown.

I'm not paying $500 or a video card either (especially in addition to an upgrade of my 400W power supply). So if I upgrade my 9800 non-pro at all, it's going to be between the 12 pipe NV40, and 12 pipe R420.
 
Interestingly enough if what Techreport shows is accurate, then you might be alright with your existing powersupply.

power.gif




I'm not worried since I don't plan to get the 6800U.

I may consider the 6800NU if it outperforms the R420.
 
Your 400W should be fine if it's high quality and you don't have too many hard disks.

I got my sample NV40 to boot and bench with a 300W piece of crap, with a little persuasion.

Tested with 3 PSUs, a 480W Tagan (worth your cash if you are upgrading, they rock), 431W Enermax and 300W Mercury, all three ran the card OK with a couple of hard drives and opticals.

Provided you get an NV40 of course.

Rys
 
ChronoReverse said:
Interestingly enough if what Techreport shows is accurate, then you might be alright with your existing powersupply.

Well, I'm currently running a 9800 non-pro, so we're likely talking more like 40-50 more watts for a 6800 Ultra (all from the 12V rail) than I'm currently drawing under load.

Plus, I'm already directly venting my 9800 heat out of the case with a VGA silencer to keep internal temps down for noise level concerns. No, the 6800 Ultra will not find a home in my box.
 
Joe DeFuria said:
I'm not paying $500 or a video card either (especially in addition to an upgrade of my 400W power supply). So if I upgrade my 9800 non-pro at all, it's going to be between the 12 pipe NV40, and 12 pipe R420.

Have you ever considered the value of buying a next gen card as soon as it comes out? For instance, I purchased my 9700 Pro as soon as it came out 2.5 years ago. If you break down the cost, it comes out to approx. ~$13/month for my $400 purchase up front. I think the high cost paid for itself in the end and I can still play new games such as Far Cry.

BTW - I realize most hardcore gmers won't keep a video card for 2.5 years but assuming the new($500) card lasts 1.5 years. That is about ~$28/month.

Just food for thought.
 
Helevitia said:
Have you ever considered the value of buying a next gen card as soon as it comes out?

Yes, I usually do "consider it." ;) Part of the value of a new card is how much better it plays the games I play. So yes, a $500 could last me longer...but if that card doesn't give me any significnt higher satisfaction than my current card for the games I play...I could wait and spend $500 6 months or a year from now and it will last that much longer.
 
Here's to hoping the NV40/U and R420P/XT find their way into the NewEgg Refurb section fairly quick. I picked up my 9700Pro back in Nov-2002 for $215. Easily worth every single penny and more. I could have easily sold it an entire year later and still have made money on it.
 
Helevitia said:
Joe DeFuria said:
I'm not paying $500 or a video card either (especially in addition to an upgrade of my 400W power supply). So if I upgrade my 9800 non-pro at all, it's going to be between the 12 pipe NV40, and 12 pipe R420.
Have you ever considered the value of buying a next gen card as soon as it comes out? For instance, I purchased my 9700 Pro as soon as it came out 2.5 years ago. If you break down the cost, it comes out to approx. ~$13/month for my $400 purchase up front. I think the high cost paid for itself in the end and I can still play new games such as Far Cry.

BTW - I realize most hardcore gmers won't keep a video card for 2.5 years but assuming the new($500) card lasts 1.5 years. That is about ~$28/month.

Just food for thought.
Good logc except that the 9700 Pro wasn't even released 2 years ago :) IIRC, the 9700 Pro began shipping in Aug. 2002.
 
Back
Top