Recent content by Remij

I already said that. Forget about the damn pricing for a second. These cards... and all generations of cards.. are separated into tier ranges by Nvidia and AMD. There's acceptable price ranges for each tier of card. Nah, It's entirely based off what value Nvidia thinks these tiers are...

No, because we'd know the slowest product relative to the highest product regardless of what they are called...... They COULD call the slowest product the 5090... but then the 5090 would be an entry level product....

Never said it had to be set in stone. Regardless of what they call it... it will be classified by them as low end, mid range, high end, and Enthusiast. Expectations will remain what they are.

Prices of tiers relative to each other.. We know Nvidia bins chips based on "how much" of the chip is fully active.. we know prices are determined by many many other factors.. It's not saying you have the right to the best card for some fixed price... it's saying that what THEY classify their...

Yes it does. It should fall within an expected range limit. If that number creeps higher and higher generation after generation... then prices are being increased. Again... it's expected that lower end products of future generations will perform better than higher end products from past...

Don't care if you agree or not. I'm stating my stance on it. There's nothing arbitrary about my reasoning. Nvidia has set a clear naming convention which, for generations now, has remained the same. It's not "the name" it's the tiers of their GPUs within a generation. They're clearly...

If Nvidia decides to launch a $2500 card with twice the performance of a 4090, and they call it the 5090... then that means prices have increased. We've been over this before. The cards ALL follow basic naming schemes so people can easily tell what tier of card they are within their...

Nobody said anything was going to happen "this instant"? Why do defensive people ALWAYS act like the thing you claim is going to happen... has to be happening this instant and since it's not.. it invalidates your argument?

And you think 2.5D substrate capacities wont improve in the future to accommodate the demand for AI chips specifically?

This is simply ridiculous. I'm a huge fan of Nvidia.

Yes, we will wait and see. Because sales will fall off.. and that opens a window for their competitors to gain ground.

That only shows back to 2020... Let's look further back than even 2014, which I posted before... And again.. you're going to quickly see how what is 10% of TSMC's capacity now... explodes in the very near future. You're basing your assumptions off of how the market is right now, but...

I'm not going to keep going back and forth. I'll simply return to this thread and quote myself in the not too distant future. :)

No, I'm saying that companies like TSMC will take advantage of how extremely reliant they are and costs will go up, whether Nvidia likes it or not. At that point, Nvidia will need to raise prices if they want to continue making money off gaming GPUs. At that point sales will drop.. more and...

Less and less people each year... resulting in less of them being produced... resulting in increased focus on other markets which can pay exorbitant prices. They're pricing the average gamer out of PC gaming. PC gamers who don't want to own the bottom of the barrel offering simply because...