Yeah that's great. But it wasn't me that came up with the term. Pretty much every single review site and video out there compares cards using "raster performance" and "RT performance".
Doesn't matter; it's all rasterized in the end. They are different graphical settings, and nothing more.
They are all real, with different graphics settings. The first one is 1440p native, the second is 4k native with low settings. Why is that so difficult? And pixel shading is a primary...
You can :ROFLMAO: all you want. It is fake performance if you claim that it renders at a higher resolution when it's not. Just like frame generation produces fake frames, upscaling produces fake pixels. Simple as that.
Yes, and that would be measurable.
Is it really rendering?
Remember...
Exactly. Who would sponsor a game, to then at the same time allow the competitor to market with the same game, where they basically didn't contribute anything through development? It simply does not work in practice.
So in reality, it is nVidia's requirements for implementing DLSS that limit...
Benchmarks were never intended to match how people ultimately play the games. Considering most people are running either 1060s, 1650s or 3060s, we can assume that most of them are not running max settings in most games, yet benchmarks are pretty much always at max settings. They are there to...
Easy to say in hindsight.
It's relatively easy to implement technically. It doesn't mean it's easy to implement legally. What are nVidia's requirements for officially including DLSS in a game?
It's only a proper ratio when the same settings are used on both cards. Otherwise we are comparing apples to oranges. Lowering the settings on one to then compare to the other to somehow change the performance ratio is deliberately putting a bias into the comparison.
And then there's additional...
To me, he seems to have a good track-record regarding leaks.
If you would have watched more than 30 seconds you would have understood what happened. The game was being developed on Vulkan and was a mess. They decided late in development to switch to DX12 (for whatever reason). They had issues...
The only thing wrong with the 7800XT in today's market is its name. Other than that, it hits all the necessary boxes to be a great product. There's a reason it basically sold out everywhere.
Was it really supposed to be a mature discussion about the marketplace? This thread was created because nVidia fanboys were infesting the AMD thread and discussions arose about how nVidia and its blind followers have been messing up the market. I would know, because I was quoted in the opening...
Actually...
ATI TruForm was a brand by ATI (now AMD) for a SIP block capable of doing a graphics procedure called tessellation in computer hardware. ATI TruForm was included into Radeon 8500 (available from August 2001 on) and newer products.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATI_TruForm
That...
Against the infinite on-going onslaught of nVidia fanboys that constantly infest every single thread about AMD, which was the reason this thread was created in the first place. It's like fighting a zombie armada. And sorry, but if you walk talk and quack like a zombie, you'll get shot with the...
Doing the same as you, considering that this is "not any point related to the topic, there is nothing to respond to".
Pure nonsense.
You all sure act like it, constantly pretending that AMD can't do it. And you know damn well what I mean. nVidia were the first to advertise it and accelerate it...