deviantchild
Regular
And it is fuck!ng thieving, no matter what you call it.
It's actually all about robbing popular sites' traffic +/ holding them to ransom and that's it.
A bit of irony for you (notice the .com.com)
and here's the .com version today
It seriously makes me fuck!ng angry though.
Especially when one of these leeches picks up an old developer site and puts a 'No Robots' request (double standards, anyone?) that Archive.org goes and honours - because they are honourable (unlike the fuck5 who have nicked the site) - leaving the history unobtainable.
Admittedly, someone's going to buy those up, but the hijacking current sites situation is out of order.
Trying to get legitimate results out of search-engines is a fuck!ng tiresome chore these days!
Anyone know what's being done about it, or can direct me to better resources?
I mean, in the court of law, it's obvious what has happened and why.
I guess the law is an ass, as they say.
It's actually all about robbing popular sites' traffic +/ holding them to ransom and that's it.
A bit of irony for you (notice the .com.com)
and here's the .com version today
It seriously makes me fuck!ng angry though.
Especially when one of these leeches picks up an old developer site and puts a 'No Robots' request (double standards, anyone?) that Archive.org goes and honours - because they are honourable (unlike the fuck5 who have nicked the site) - leaving the history unobtainable.
Admittedly, someone's going to buy those up, but the hijacking current sites situation is out of order.
Trying to get legitimate results out of search-engines is a fuck!ng tiresome chore these days!
Anyone know what's being done about it, or can direct me to better resources?
I mean, in the court of law, it's obvious what has happened and why.
I guess the law is an ass, as they say.