http://www.google.com/googlespreadsheets/tour1.html
Im getting scared.
Im getting scared.
pascal said:Goodbye MS
You think Google care about what is in your data? Most spreadsheet data is useless to anyone other than the people who know what it represents; otherwise it's just numbers and figures without context. A lot of data is also not particularly top-secret. Regardless, Google privacy policy means that they are not going to give your data to third parties.RussSchultz said:Yeah, good plan. I'm going to give google all my spreadsheets. RIIIIGHT.
Which software companies don't? Whilst Google may operate in, say, China and censor the data they serve there, that doesn't mean they freely share that data with any third parties. Google refused to share data with the US government and, as far as I know, they have never disclosed individual's data to the authorities (unlike Microsoft and Yahoo). So, if you are concerned about ethics then stop using Excel. If you are concerned about total privacy then stop using the internet (because your ISP is far more likely to cough up personal data to the authorities than Google is).Because, we know they'd never collaborate with fascist regime to make a buck. NEVER.
...Unlike the US gov't?RussSchultz said:Because, we know they'd never collaborate with fascist regime to make a buck. NEVER.
RussSchultz said:Yeah, good plan. I'm going to give google all my spreadsheets. RIIIIGHT.
RussSchultz said:Because, we know they'd never collaborate with fascist regime to make a buck. NEVER.
And you dont' see me giving them my spreadsheets, either.Guden Oden said:...Unlike the US gov't?
What about microsoft?
Google has demonstrated that they're more than willing to accomodate the Chinese regime in their attempts to control information.I don't really understand your point. Capitalists make a buck wherever they can, fascist regimes or not. Nothing's new here, you know that.
RussSchultz said:And you dont' see me giving them my spreadsheets, either.
Google has demonstrated that they're more than willing to accomodate the Chinese regime in their attempts to control information.
This is philosophically wrong, to me.
And its right for you?Skrying said:Wait wait, controlling information is wrong to you? LOL
DiGuru said:I might use it, but I like OpenOffice. And it would require a fast internet link, which isn't always available at companies. (The link might be fast, but it has to be shared by many.)
Ummm... yes, of course they care! This is a company whose self-declared goal is to know everything about their customers.Diplo said:You think Google care about what is in your data?
They don't have to distribute the data, in fact it's not in their interest to do so. Their "product" is a service through which they offer targetted advertising... "give us your ads and, for a price, we'll make sure the right people see them". How do they work out where best to target the adverts? By using all the personal information that people seem to be so willing to store on their servers!Regardless, Google privacy policy means that they are not going to give your data to third parties.
But that was more because it was being done by Microsoft who, at the time, had a very bad reputation for security (and still do). The ideas behind Passport are fine, it's just that nobody would trust Microsoft with their data - not because of the usual anti-Microsoft rehetoric but because of sound facts.nutball said:I must say I do find it rather amusing that when Microsoft proposed this model five years ago (their original concept for the Passport scheme) the geeks of the world were up in arms.
Google has admitted for the first time that it compromised its principles when it entered the Chinese market and agreed to toe Beijing’s strict line on censorship.