Hmm. The files you refer to have these entries:
Regardless, Rosetta 2 seems to either do extremely well, or even extremer well.
Unless they are running measurement tools such as GB5, I don’t see that users will be able to tell from the seat of their pants whether the application code is native or not. Most apps spend considerable time in system calls (which are native), or constrained by some other bottleneck such as main memory latency or bandwidth, or I/O. GB5 differences are exaggerated compared to actual use. Which is actually quite remarkable.
and{
"id": 15,
"name": "Processor Frequency",
"value": "2.40 GHz",
"ivalue": 2400000000,
"fvalue": 2400000000.0
}
respectively. I don’t have access yet to both so I can’t compare physically. (And when I do, I’d feel constrained by the NDA, however utterly pointless in this case.){
"id": 15,
"name": "Processor Frequency",
"value": "2.49 GHz",
"ivalue": 2490000000,
"fvalue": 2489999872.0
}
Regardless, Rosetta 2 seems to either do extremely well, or even extremer well.
Unless they are running measurement tools such as GB5, I don’t see that users will be able to tell from the seat of their pants whether the application code is native or not. Most apps spend considerable time in system calls (which are native), or constrained by some other bottleneck such as main memory latency or bandwidth, or I/O. GB5 differences are exaggerated compared to actual use. Which is actually quite remarkable.