Anyone up for a big juicy rumor?

E

elimc

Newcomer
This is probably just a joke, but, it's nice to spice things up . . .

http://www.3dfxzone.it/forumzone/to...500+MAXX+!!!&Forum_Title=Altri+produttori

9500maxx3.jpg


9500maxx2.jpg


9500maxx.jpg
 
Wish it was true, 27K 3dmarks would be awesome, but im quite sure its fake (and has been already posted by DoomTrooper anyway).

Did 3dmark guys ever publish the formula they use to calculate the final score from the fps ? (i believe the fps are used to do this?) in case we could check if the numbers match =)
 
taken from www.3dfxzone.it

All'attenzione di futuri mistificatori.
Ricordo che 3DMark 2001 calcola il proprio punteggio in base alla seguente formula: 10*(Game_1_Car Chase_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_1_Car Chase_High_Detail_FPS + Game_2_Dragothic_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_2_Dragothic_High_Detail_FPS + Game_3_Lobby_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_3_Lobby_Low_Detail_FPS)
Ossia nel caso in questione:
10*(398.8+2*138.1+497.9+2*266.3+304.3+2*146.2)=23022 3D Marks e non come riportato 27573 3D Marks. Tutti gli altri test del benchmark sono ininfluenti per la determinazione del valore di 3D Marks.

Its italian but numbers speak for themselves, they could just do better fakes.
 
Mummy said:
taken from www.3dfxzone.it

All'attenzione di futuri mistificatori.
Ricordo che 3DMark 2001 calcola il proprio punteggio in base alla seguente formula: 10*(Game_1_Car Chase_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_1_Car Chase_High_Detail_FPS + Game_2_Dragothic_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_2_Dragothic_High_Detail_FPS + Game_3_Lobby_Low_Detail_FPS + 2 * Game_3_Lobby_Low_Detail_FPS)
Ossia nel caso in questione:
10*(398.8+2*138.1+497.9+2*266.3+304.3+2*146.2)=23022 3D Marks e non come riportato 27573 3D Marks. Tutti gli altri test del benchmark sono ininfluenti per la determinazione del valore di 3D Marks.

Its italian but numbers speak for themselves, they could just do better fakes.
Click to expand...

Pity they forgot to take into account the nature test when they added that score.

Its actually irrelevant as its still doesn't add up right (23022+144.9*20=25920) but if they're going to show a fake they could do it properly :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top