raytracingfan
Newcomer
The only thing bad about the RTX 4080 was its launch price. The performance gain over the 3080 was enough to be considered a true successor, and complaining about the performance gap to the 4090 doesn't make any sense. It's clear that the 4090 represented an entirely new class of graphics card, a super-flagship sitting far and above AMD's 7900XTX and Nvidia's previous flagships in performance and transistor count and priced accordingly. And the 3080 was a fluke, it was far closer to the 3090 than Nvidia because it used the same GA102 die, when Nvidia likely originally intended it to be on the 103 die like the 4080. Prior generations don't have a xx90 to serve as a comparison anyways. If the 5080 is the same price or cheaper than the 4080 Super and delivers a significant performance increase then that would be great regardless of what the 5090 is.