Recent content by Soir

Was ADDED, not removed, and apparently, Edit is not allowed on the forums :( There seems to be some other smaller change down there.

Also, it would seem like one capacitor was removed, center, bottom.

50 ft/meters is still not even close to 100 meters (200 meters 10Base2) when measuring cable :) mkillio: I think you should run a cable, it's also futureproof if you get more consoles, you just add a switch at the end where you connect your console.

Agreed. Well, unless SONY comes out with some new information / updates the specsheet, this thread seems to have lost it's meaning. So as things stand right now, both packs will come with wireless controllers, or at least support them. Some mod can just lock the thread.

Shogmaster: Exactly, the specsheet says that both have BlueTooth and SONY hasn't officially said anything else. And it would really cripple the cheap pack, even though it's already not that attractive.

According to Games Radar the cheaper version ($499) of PS3 won't be compatible with the wireless controllers. The cheaper version also lacks replaceable harddrive too, according to Games Radar. I can't see the logic here - this can't be true, right? I mean, in the PS3 specsheet it clearly...

Link is dead, could someone repost it?

So couldn't it be that Cell handles the Audio but then sends it to RSX so that it can output it through HDMI?

Actually, there is a display here in Europe that has a resolution of 1920x1080, can display 1080p/60, has HDMI and has a size of 37 inch. It's the Amoi LC37AF1E The price in Sweden: $2900 (tax included, 25%). A 42" screen is soon to be released.

Those images ARE taken from the game running in RealTime, and they can be seen in the new issue of PlayStation2 UK Magazine.

Copied from Blu-Ray.com Isn't that logical? How could 1x act as '1.5x' ? 1.5x is what you would require in a perfect world, but IRL you never reach the absolute peak of the speed, so you would need to have a bit more than 1.5x IRL, say 2x - if not even more.