Recent content by Rikimaru

I've seen rumour that AVX512 is 2x faster, which could explain the difference.

No. It's useless. 27" 4k monitor has less pixel density than Switch. It just needs antialiasing.

Afaik the problem is a lot of multiplatform discs have Xbox One version. And it needs download for X. So physical is useless for preservation.

I've never dropped a CPU but I think it's pretty easy to drop LGA CPU on MB. They are very thin and do not have a lot of area for a good grip.

LGA MB pins break much more easily.

I think MS would be content with 7nm S. 5nm is more expensive and chip redesign is not free. X on other hand would benefit from 5nm with smaller heatsink and lower power requirements.

There is a Switch :) PS4 Slim is rather small.

Not yet. A fine B550 board is $80 ($60 low end) while Z690 > $200 USD.

I've tried to use it but it only implements TensorFlow 1.15 and stuff i try is 2.x now.

I remember there was a talk about optimizing latencies on PS5. Maybe that make a difference too.

PS3 YLoD is due NEC/TOKIN capacitors most of the time, not solder. Earlier models could be overengineered to be more robust, but also have a known problems corrected in later revisions.

PS2 was designed to stream data to VRAM constantly. PS2 does not have hw compression, but supports palletized textures. GC and Xbox have hw compression afaik. GC was limited by main RAM, but some devs used slow ARAM as a data cache.

PS4 "chipset" was also made by Marvell.

It's just a cost reduction. PS2 and PS3 had like 20 revisions. https://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/Motherboard_Revisions https://playstationdev.wiki/ps2devwiki/index.php?title=Motherboards

Mariko dips to 20 fps too.