Well looking at the X Box Series X 315W PSU, the power supply is nominally 255W (12V main output) + 60W (others).
So with the caliber rated at about 255W and the actual operating power consumption at about 140W (multiplied by the efficiency of DC-DC (usually about 80%))... gets us to about 120W...
The 80 CU's.... (not me)
but it is getting some discussion on Chiphell https://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2257320&extra=page%3D1%26filter%3Dtypeid%26typeid%3D223
My question is around the cost. If NV are doing so much in house..... is AMD paying MS for something similar to DLSS? License fee's?? MS doesn't do free or for the good of their heart.
Moore's Law is Dead update video -
GA102 has apparently 384-bit Bus Width | 5376 CUDA Cores | 230W | 18gbps and boosts 2.2GHz +.
864GB/s bandwidth (40% more that 2080Ti) | Overall performance 50% faster than 2080 Ti
Nvidia's gaming revenue is way down quarter on quarter and consensus is that is related to those high prices for original RTX if not as mentioned earlier for folks on the fence but didn't buy. The (S) cards give no reason to buy a Radeon 7 for gaming and damper AMD's Navi for sure. What sucks is...
I’m wondering if Turing inherits Volta’s approach on thread scheduling in a Warp. With Volta having each thread with its own execution state, the GPU can switch back and forth between thread groups whenever it needs to in order to maximize efficiency. Then the GPU program can sync up later to...