Assuming 2.2 ghz on the big cores and 1.6 ghz on the little:
(2162*2) 4324+ ((2162 * (16 / 22)) * 2)3144 = 7468
I was working with the overall score whereas you seem to be working with just the integer score. Makes sense because you can't expect the memory score to scale linearly with core count.
It fares better than the A9 on the memory score.
Looking at those numbers and assuming a frequency of 2.2ghz, it has aproximatley the same integer IPC as A57 but 50% more floating point IPC. Memory performance is about 2x better.
The multi-core performance is strangely low though. You'd think...
Still 3-wide apparently. Apple really caught the rest of the industry with their pants down it seems. When are we going to see someone other than Apple attempt a really wide core?
GFXBench scores:
http://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx30&os=Android&api=gl&D=Samsung Galaxy S6 (SM-G920)
25.8 fps in manhattan. Not bad. For comparison, the 810 in the HTC One M9 gets 22.6 fps.
Taipan, like Krait, is a type of snake so it fits in with their reptilian theme. I'm a bit puzzled by the presence of big.LITTLE. Wasn't it a fairly unique idea when ARM came up with the scheme for A15/A7? Now we have Qualcomm also agreeing this is the right way forward for mobile SOCs.