Recent content by Ateo

You might have your self convinced of that, but that you post all these words and still not haave psoted your audiochip sepaks volumes to me. And when i get home after the 19th I will place my actions where my word is, as I will record Crysis running from my onboard and the running on my X-Fi...

All these words, and still you can't post what audiochip you use? :roll: /sing Beating around the bush, hope no one hear me...

Still grasping after straws are we? Didn't you leave? Did you forget the name of your audio? You still havn't delivered anything Mr. my-onboard-sound-can-do-128-hardware-accelerated-simultaneous-sounds. (PS. The next best thing after I went X-Fi was to go from 5.1 to 7.1...I thought 5.1...

Yeah run away Mr. my-onboard-sound-can-do-128-hardware-accelerated-simultaneous-sounds...

I don't have to, even if a game don support EAX, it dosn't take away the X-Fi's superior 3D positioning...when will you start being intellectual honest? Are you claming that you soundcard can do 128 hardware accelerated sounds at the same time? Name you onbaord sound, and you will have...

Not anyway near as accurate, which is his and my point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_audio_extensions#EAX_5.0 EAX 5.0 EAX 5.0 is present in Sound Blaster X-Fi sound cards. * 128 simultaneous voices processable in hardware and up to 4 effects on each * EAX Voice...

First time i fired Battlefield 2 up with EAX 5.0 and 7.1 I actually moved my head due to a bullet buzzing by...:lol: I have grown used to using sound in the Army..now I can use it in games to...I love it!

Are you being deliberately stupid? Search for "immersion" *hint-hint* Like I stated, you fail for wanting to divert from the RESULTS!!! :roll: What next...Windows is evil because it not an open standard? :roll:

Most games I play actually support EAX *shrugs* Borderline lying now are we? http://www.guru3d.com/article/auzentech-xfi-prelude-71-review/6 It's more icing on the cake, just like AA/AF...you keep deraling about the technique, not the results and thus you fail.

I compare the two(well three actually) because the effects of the effects and similar. More real world like, sure you can game without, but that removes a lot of the immersion. I personally game on a X-Fi Elite Pro with 7.1 surround and there is no way I could go back. And if you ever game...

Nice skipping over the comparisons with AA and AF :roll: But have you ever heard an EAX 5.0 game on EAX 5.0 hardware? Simple yes/no question.

The problem for AMD is that the 45 nm Phenom is 258 mm2 and the 45nm Core2Quad is 214 mm2. Add the complexity of the Phenom2 (More transistors than the i7) to table, add Intel's more mature 45nm process and you have a bleak endgame for AMD. Intel have been using it's 65nm Q6600 to hold the...

You are looking at this the wrong way. EAX 5.0 ADDS to the immersion and is only possbile on a X-Fi. The same way that AA of AF taxes performance, but gives better IQ and thus better immersion. It's not only about the performance, it's also about the features. But here is some nice reading...

Didn't take long for Intel to put the hurt on AMD's new Phenom 2 line, with pricecuts from 15-40%: http://64.233.183.101/translate_c?hl=da&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http://www.hardware.fr/news/10062/baisse-quad-intel-18.html&usg=ALkJrhiyOi6BgHdMj3R8QQ0v5q_pucls3w AMD put in check again, and we are back to...

Did you try and install the drivers in "Vista Compatible" mode?