Recent content by aeryon

ok got it. sorry for the trouble. my mistake but I was thinking personal attack was not allowed on this forum. By the way telling the truth is not PR and I don't work on PR.

ok no more words for now but I will up this message in october :cool:

don't be missunderstood, these days NV cares much more about Larrabee than AMD. Larrabee is dangerous because nobody at NV knows what Intel is preparing. it puts a strong pressure on G100 and that's why the best NV team (leaded by Erik Lindholm for Computation macroarch) is working on it with so...

no problem if more than twice flop performance doesn't mean nothing for you. I must be stupid :cry: Of course it's not the only factor but still an important one, as it is where G8x was arguably lacking.

I think the same in high-end. AMD has no single chance this year if G92 destroys poor R650. Then they could only recover if R700 will be incredible because G100 will be! However, in mid-range market, the fight will be more difficult for NVIDIA.

what a good sync : http://www.beyond3d.com/content/news/230 some blurb from this news: I cannot say more publicly but you can already start to make your own opinion :wink:

1/ no UVD engine on RV515. (by UVD I mean the full VC1/H264 engine found on RV630/610. see my posted graph above) 2/ frequent or not isn't the problem. In consumer point of view, rebranding is very bad practice and when we see some cases of it, we must denounce it. last bottom product of...

Nobody will argue against the fact that AMD/ATI marketing sux*d badly hard since months (DX10 family launch joke, perfect R600 drivers fiasco, obscure UVD informations on R600, renaming RV515 as HD2300 and so on) I think they must fire a bunch of guys in the marcomm dept as they create more...

R650 is heavily based on R600 and no one will argue against that. So the only thing we can assume for sure is that R650 work started after R600 nearly finished debugging process. IMHO, R650 started really in January when R600 A13 silicon came back. If R650 comes next September, it gives 9 months...

no need to go into deep details to see the big picture. if R650 is only a 65nm speed bumped version of R600 and even if R650 will also include some minor tweaks (and please don't argue with big changes, time is simply too short), I cannot see how it can offer 2x more real gaming performance than...

short answer, R650 will fail like R600 failed against G80...

hmmm I don't want to be rude but sorry too, I don't think it's nonsense. I think You mixed up my mind and/or you did not understood what I said. I will try to be more clear here: 1/ I agree that UVD has nothing to do with HDMI and I never said that (Look, it has a point mark separating my my...

So I hope AMD will improve DX10 particles performance in R650 :

hmmmm source: dynamic branching test on hardware.fr not really what you say, in fact quite the opposite...

No time to reply to other points (and everybody can easily give good arguments against them) but one shocks me since a lot of people is confused about R600 specs: 5) HD2900XT has no UVD engine. this new UVD is only for RV610/630 and HDMI is only 1.2 so not compatible with HD-DVD and Blue Ray...