Ah, good old slashdot, where Microsoft bashing is not just in vogue, but virtually required in every single damned thread, even if the news story is about lamb in Australia. Where people routinely claim that the average Microsoft NT installation crashes multiple times per day.
Funny how anyone who actually works in a corporate environment (running servers or help desk) hasn't had this experience. Linux zealots actually think that when the X-Server or buggy Linux clone apps (KDE office, Gnome, etc) core dump, the fact that they don't take down the whole OS and spill you back to the command line where you have lost all of your work is a huge consolation to former Windows users. Where not having to reboot the kernel, but reboot every other GUI process in the system is a significant advancement in the history of computer science. I'm sure my moment knows how to run GDB on the core and strip out some of her lost documents.
You know, Microsoft is not stopping you from writing, let's say, a killer email application or browser. They really aren't. Opera software, for example, wrote a really nice browser and is doing well in the mobile/PDA market. For PC's they tried to charge money or make you watch a permanent AD banner in the browser. Most people don't want to deal with this if a non-spyware-enabled free browser exists. The fact that consumers won't buy a web browser is not really Microsoft's fault. I would never by a web browser, even if Microsoft didn't exist. Before Netscape, I was using Mosaic and Viola already. And I expect plenty of "free" browsers would have came along and comoditized the market already.
You're just going to have to get used to the fact that you can't write one piece of software and just keep selling the same thing over and over again. If you want your business to survive, you've got to keep adding to it, giving people a reason to upgrade or to purchase new versions of it.
Once a piece of software becomes very widely deployed (let's say GIF decompression algorithm), people expect it to be there by default, like the air your breathe, and you can no longer make a viable business say, selling GIF viewers. Very quickly, if there is any money in GIF viewers, the market will be flooded by them, the price will be reduced to near ZERO quickly (because the marginal cost of copying information is next to zero) by all the competition, most of the companies selling GIF viewers will go out of business, and at that point in time, GIF decompression has been rendered a commodity.
I'm sorry if you think Microsoft is evil for bundling utilities and applications into the OS distribution which are not longer differentiable products, but it is good for the vast majority of consumers. And Microsoft software doesn't suck anymore than buggy crap that you download RPMs for Linux.
It's rose colored glasses than sensitizes people to any mention of a Windows bug, by blinds them to any Unix bugs. Just sit in bugtraq or security-focus mailing lists. Daily there is some new security exploit for Unices, but it's not major news. The moment someone finds even the most trivial Windows exploit, it's all over Slashdot as "proof" how bad Microsoft programmers are. If you get a Kernel panic on Linux, someone will just tell you that you have a bad kernel module or distribution, but if it happens on Windows? Oh boy, more proof that Windows NT/XP is inherently unreliable written by suck-ass programmers.
Funny how anyone who actually works in a corporate environment (running servers or help desk) hasn't had this experience. Linux zealots actually think that when the X-Server or buggy Linux clone apps (KDE office, Gnome, etc) core dump, the fact that they don't take down the whole OS and spill you back to the command line where you have lost all of your work is a huge consolation to former Windows users. Where not having to reboot the kernel, but reboot every other GUI process in the system is a significant advancement in the history of computer science. I'm sure my moment knows how to run GDB on the core and strip out some of her lost documents.
You know, Microsoft is not stopping you from writing, let's say, a killer email application or browser. They really aren't. Opera software, for example, wrote a really nice browser and is doing well in the mobile/PDA market. For PC's they tried to charge money or make you watch a permanent AD banner in the browser. Most people don't want to deal with this if a non-spyware-enabled free browser exists. The fact that consumers won't buy a web browser is not really Microsoft's fault. I would never by a web browser, even if Microsoft didn't exist. Before Netscape, I was using Mosaic and Viola already. And I expect plenty of "free" browsers would have came along and comoditized the market already.
You're just going to have to get used to the fact that you can't write one piece of software and just keep selling the same thing over and over again. If you want your business to survive, you've got to keep adding to it, giving people a reason to upgrade or to purchase new versions of it.
Once a piece of software becomes very widely deployed (let's say GIF decompression algorithm), people expect it to be there by default, like the air your breathe, and you can no longer make a viable business say, selling GIF viewers. Very quickly, if there is any money in GIF viewers, the market will be flooded by them, the price will be reduced to near ZERO quickly (because the marginal cost of copying information is next to zero) by all the competition, most of the companies selling GIF viewers will go out of business, and at that point in time, GIF decompression has been rendered a commodity.
I'm sorry if you think Microsoft is evil for bundling utilities and applications into the OS distribution which are not longer differentiable products, but it is good for the vast majority of consumers. And Microsoft software doesn't suck anymore than buggy crap that you download RPMs for Linux.
It's rose colored glasses than sensitizes people to any mention of a Windows bug, by blinds them to any Unix bugs. Just sit in bugtraq or security-focus mailing lists. Daily there is some new security exploit for Unices, but it's not major news. The moment someone finds even the most trivial Windows exploit, it's all over Slashdot as "proof" how bad Microsoft programmers are. If you get a Kernel panic on Linux, someone will just tell you that you have a bad kernel module or distribution, but if it happens on Windows? Oh boy, more proof that Windows NT/XP is inherently unreliable written by suck-ass programmers.