Unreal Engine 3 on R420 at GDC

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by SpellSinger, Mar 27, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bjorn

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luleå, Sweden
    Yeah, that would make the 9800 XT, ok, let's say 5X faster then the NV40 then. Which would make the NV40 what, 2X slower then the NV30 ?

    It gets better and better.
     
  2. 991060

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Beijing
    That's an explaination, maybe you are right.

    But if I was the PR manager from nVIDIA, I would not let Epic demo the UE3 on NV40 in the first place if there was such big differences...

    I would not pay to demo my baby at 5 FPS, let alone in the same room with a card runs 5X faster. Man, I just think it's ridiculous. :shock:
     
  3. PatrickL

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    13
    Well with dave cryptic post, may we think that R420 will at least not need a very exotic cooling solution to work fine ?
     
  4. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pretty cool how you can get 5X out of one card runs choppy and the other runs smooth. You're amazing dude!!!
     
  5. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep. Thanks for clearing that one up :wink:
     
  6. PaulS

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    UK
    You guesstimated one was running at 5-10fps, the other at 30fps at a much higher resolution. So yeah.
     
  7. Evanescence

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA | Germany
    @ SpellSinger

    Excuse me, nothing against you, but I believe your information no word. Either the Epic guy has said something wrong or you have understood something wrong.

    16x1 vs 12x1 by 5x faster ? ...

    All details without Shaders 3.0 ? .... :?:
     
  8. PatrickL

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    13
    16x1 and 12x1 are just rumors, not facts ya know ;)
     
  9. 991060

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Beijing
    I'm thinking maybe Epic was using PS3.0 for NV40 and PS2.0(2.b?) for R420, and nVIDIA just had a bad implementation for dynamic branching. :lol:
    We all know there're many methods to do dynamic branching and the performances can vary a lot.
     
  10. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually I never said 30FPS. It was smoother running. Please go back and read again. No worrys mate!
     
  11. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Could be. Both ATI and NV will have lots of time to optimize and probably had very little time before GDC. It was cool to see both in action.
     
  12. vogel

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    The below is not accurate.

    -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc.

     
  13. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    What resolution was the demo running at? Thanks!
     
  14. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    And GREAT job on the engine. It rocks!!
     
  15. tEd

    tEd Casual Member
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    70
    Location:
    switzerland
    feel free to make it accurate :wink:
     
  16. PaulS

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    UK
    Fair enough, you didn't say 30fps. You said it was running very smoothly, which - to me - indicates around 30fps. Very smooth certainly wouldn't be <25fps.

    But i'll let it slide in light of the confirmation that the main part of your report was inaccurate.
     
  17. PatrickL

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    13
    from http://www.gamespot.com/news/2004/03/24/news_6092217.html

    So it seems some others noticed it was not very smooth.
     
  18. SpellSinger

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry I wasn't aware of this standard. I'll keep it in mind the next time I post and didn't mean to cause a problem for you. I'm not so sure it was an inaccurate observation.
     
  19. PaulS

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    UK
    I can fully believe it was choppy on NV40 - what I can't believe is that ATi had a part there which was faster by several degrees throughout, even at a higher resolution and more detail. Especially since the engine is looking at these cards as the minimum spec - not something you'd expect to run it at 1024x768 "very smoothly".
     
  20. PatrickL

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes Received:
    13
    Well i bet Daniel will tell us the resolutions? it should not be a secret as i guess a lot of guys seeing theses demos could tell us the resolutions in a heartbeat.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...