The AMD Execution Thread [2019]

Discussion in 'Graphics and Semiconductor Industry' started by BRiT, Jan 7, 2019.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■) Moderator Legend Alpha

    The 2019 edition of the AMD execution thread.
     
    Tags:
    MBTP likes this.
  2. Alexko

    Alexko Veteran Subscriber

    Well, just to get the conversation started, Lisa Su is set to give Wednesday's CES opening keynote:
    https://www.ces.tech/Conference/Keynote-Addresses.aspx

    I'm not sure whether it's supposed to be a simple exposition of AMD's vision of computing, or whether there might be announcements. I hope it's the latter, which should give us some clue of what to expect for this tread.
     
    Lightman likes this.
  3. https://www.anandtech.com/show/13917/amd-earnings-report-q4-fy-2018

    AMD's first profitable year since... 2010? 2011? I can't find the info on that.
    Though from Ian Cutress' comments, I think they might have pushed forward the hit from GPU excess stock and 2nd-hand sales to achieve that.

    It doesn't mean they'll get a bad 2019, but losses during Q1'19 are expected.


    Regardless, showing a Q4 YoY growth when pretty most other tech companies took large hits made the company very tempting for investors.


    At the same time, AMD is also steadily increasing their R&D budget each quarter.
    In Q4 2018 they spent as much as they did in Q2 2010 ($371M).
    Though that's still a far cry of how much they were spending between 2007 and 2009 ($430M - $500M), without even adjusting for inflation.

    Oh and Intel still spends about 9x more at $3.3 billion.
     
    Silent_Buddha likes this.
  4. pharma

    pharma Veteran

    Mubadala divests AMD shares
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a...-mubadala-tweets-about-share-sales-2019-02-05
     
    Lightman likes this.
  5. Arnold Beckenbauer

    Arnold Beckenbauer Veteran Subscriber

    Graphics card vendors under inventory pressure

     
    pharma and Lightman like this.
  6. pharma

    pharma Veteran

    Intel snatches more AMD staff for its Xe GPU team, Heather Lennon from AMD RTG Digital Marketing

    https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-snatches-more-amd-staff-to-add-to-the-xe-gpu-teamheather-lennon-from-amd-rtg-digital-marketing.html
     
    Lightman likes this.
  7. Bondrewd

    Bondrewd Veteran

  8. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    Lightman and Tarkin1977 like this.
  9. Bondrewd

    Bondrewd Veteran

    Between this and OneAPI, I'd say the CUDA monopoly days are ~numbered.
     
    Tarkin1977 likes this.
  10. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    Not in the DCC space... where they have a literal monopoly.. But this may change if Intel's GPUs are competitive & somewhat successful..
     
  11. Alexko

    Alexko Veteran Subscriber

    What does DCC stand for?

    Good and rather unexpected news for AMD, in any case.
     
  12. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    Digital Content Creation
     
    Alexko likes this.
  13. Alexko

    Alexko Veteran Subscriber

    Ah, of course, thanks. My understanding is that AMD lags behind quite a bit in driver performance and stability for such applications, hence the huge market share gap.
     
  14. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    That's a myth similar to AMD still having shitty gaming drivers when it is in fact the opposite (Nvidia's consumer drivers releases have been abysmal for the past 4 years in terms of QA & stability.
    AMD GPUs are on par with Nvidia's in pro apps and lately even more stable. But Nvidia takes the lead when some features are CUDA only (which is the case in many DCC apps).
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2019
  15. Alexko

    Alexko Veteran Subscriber

    Are you sure about this? Last I checked a review, AMD's performance was kind of all over the place, with some good, competitive results, and some really bad ones (compared to NVIDIA).
     
  16. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    It's a toss between the two. Sometimes NV has the lead while other times AMD does (just like on the gaming side). But the real bad ones are often when a certain feature runs on CUDA on NV GPUs and on the CPU on the AMD system and the person doing the benchmark doesn't even take the time to point it out (or simply doesn't have a clue).
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2019
    tuna likes this.
  17. Alexko

    Alexko Veteran Subscriber

    Are CUDA features that important to users, or is it just market inertia, then?
     
  18. Jay

    Jay Veteran

    Is important to users as it affects performance.

    Think your question should be about devs.
     
  19. Ike Turner

    Ike Turner Veteran

    Both. Market inertia, heavy evangilsation + moneyhatting from NV + AMD not having the resources are a big part of it. All those features can be done using open standards (OpenCL/Vulkan on Win/Linux or now Metal on Apple who has ditched OpenCL) but nobody bothers now because this market is 95% running on NV GPUs (and NV worked hard to push CUDA while putting little to no effort in their OpenCL drivers...)
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2019
    Alexko likes this.
  20. Malo

    Malo Yak Mechanicum Legend Subscriber

    An example is something like Daz Studio, which I've been playing around in for about 6 months now. It's completely dominated by IRay renderer for PBR, which is provided by Nvidia. Most content produced for it is now IRay-only. There is no ProRender available for Daz.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...