I'm surprised PJ and his rather large collection of Dean Cain pics haven't arrived in this thread yet.
Cartoon Corpse said:superman is an obvious tool of the fraud.
james bond, is a much more subtle case of the same type of tripe.
can't believe people watch this stuff beyond their teen years. when they have an excuse for 'thinking' it's believable.
I'd heard that a while ago, as for faster than light:nelg said:One day Superman was flying above the League of Justis when he saw Wonder Woman sunning her self naked on the roof top. He thought to himself,"I am Superman, I could just fly down there and - bam bam bam - , screw her and fly off before she knew what happened". So he put his plan into action and swept down and in the blink of an eye - bam bam bam - he did his deed. Super Woman jumps up out of her lounge chair and screams "What the hell happened!" to which the invisible man responds " I don't know but my asshole is killing me".
You make it sound like that has anything whatsoever to do with it. People read comics because there's something to like about them, whether it be the artwork or story or characters or whatever. People who were children back when the earlier Superman movies came out have a shot at some nostalgia watching the new one. People who watch Bond films don't watch him because he's a realistic portrayal of a spy -- it's because he's a romp of a character. Even for actors who play the role, part of the point is not to look at it as a straight up serious acting role. You think there's anybody out there who watches Indiana Jones to learn about archaeology?can't believe people watch this stuff beyond their teen years. when they have an excuse for 'thinking' it's believable.
ShootMyMonkey said:You make it sound like that has anything whatsoever to do with it. People read comics because there's something to like about them, whether it be the artwork or story or characters or whatever. People who were children back when the earlier Superman movies came out have a shot at some nostalgia watching the new one. People who watch Bond films don't watch him because he's a realistic portrayal of a spy -- it's because he's a romp of a character. Even for actors who play the role, part of the point is not to look at it as a straight up serious acting role. You think there's anybody out there who watches Indiana Jones to learn about archaeology?
Take a film like Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, and leaving aside the grammatical incorrectness of the title, the explanation for the shrinking process involved somehow closing in the electron orbitals in order to decrease the amount of empty space in the atoms, thereby making them smaller... of course, by that explanation, the shrunken children should still have the same mass as they did before. Which in turn means that being as small as they were, they'd probably just sink right through the soil on the lawn due to the extreme density. Unfortunately, that doesn't make for a very interesting movie.
ShootMyMonkey said:You make it sound like that has anything whatsoever to do with it. People read comics because there's something to like about them, whether it be the artwork or story or characters or whatever. People who were children back when the earlier Superman movies came out have a shot at some nostalgia watching the new one. People who watch Bond films don't watch him because he's a realistic portrayal of a spy -- it's because he's a romp of a character. Even for actors who play the role, part of the point is not to look at it as a straight up serious acting role. You think there's anybody out there who watches Indiana Jones to learn about archaeology?
Take a film like Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, and leaving aside the grammatical incorrectness of the title, the explanation for the shrinking process involved somehow closing in the electron orbitals in order to decrease the amount of empty space in the atoms, thereby making them smaller... of course, by that explanation, the shrunken children should still have the same mass as they did before. Which in turn means that being as small as they were, they'd probably just sink right through the soil on the lawn due to the extreme density. Unfortunately, that doesn't make for a very interesting movie.
Bad_Boy said:Didn't he turn back time by flying around the earth? I dont think superman was very logical to begin with. Now Batman Begins, that was a logical superhero movie. And damn good at that.