Strongest Army in the world?

DemoCoder said:
BTW, achieving Mach1+ briefly with afterburners doesn't count on a fighter. (if fighter could sustain it, it would heat up too much)

SR-71 is a Ramjet built specifically for sustained high speed flight.

The only fighters that can sustain Mach1 fuel-efficiently for long periods is the F-22 and JSF. But even those wouldn't dare go Mach2+ for long.


At high Mach numbers, you lose manuerability, and humans could encounter crushing G-numbers if they could. UCAVs are perfectly suited for high-mach operations.

Hey! Does Concorde fly its entire journey supersonic...? That means it can sustain it....
 
Concorde is a Mach 2 plane, and yes it can sustain it but no longer as it is being retired. Too expensive. Dwindling passengers.
 
But Concorde was really a nice concept....sadly it didnt prove as successful as intially thought....it was a challenge for US aerospace giants!

I hope to see hypersonic passanger aircrafts which will be cheap and will not cause sonic boom! :LOL:
 
Breaking the sound barrier = sonic boom! at least in air. You could get away with it if you flew to the boundaries space first but to get their you need to be travelling at higher than sound speeds. Hehe.

Now I think you mean you dont want all that noise for low level flight (in take off and landing).. I believe it is being worked on, but I think you are looking at least 10 years before anything comes to fruition.

Also there was a Russian Concorde too copied almost exactly via espionage... but it crashed in a show in France I believe and the Russians terminated the project. It had front tails cos the design of the wing was not stable (the Russians didn't manage to copy that correctly in their implementation).

Some people think that a French fighter craft was also doing a reconnaisance mission on the Konkordisky whilst it was doing a test flight in front of many people in France and had some role to play in the crash (apparently it got too close or something).

I love conspiracy theories.
 
It was Tupalev-44 or something.....but Russkis make some serious stuff and they are no 2 (by not far) only to US...I woder how they avhieved this despite the fact that they have no worth mentioning Computer (H/S) industry...
 
Deepak said:
I woder how they avhieved this despite the fact that they have no worth mentioning Computer (H/S) industry...

Probobly the same way they produced 'origional' designs so oddly familiar to the American B-1a, KH-11, Akula's propeller designs, et al... :rolleyes:
 
Better than originals though ;) ...but they produce originals also which are the target of US...remember Shvakal torpedo!
 
Vince said:
Deepak said:
I woder how they avhieved this despite the fact that they have no worth mentioning Computer (H/S) industry...

Probobly the same way they produced 'origional' designs so oddly familiar to the American B-1a, KH-11, Akula's propeller designs, et al... :rolleyes:

Maybe some of the stuff is copied but.... imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Also they did innovate in their own way...like for example the Sukhoi Su 27.
 
And who can forget Buran? (At least those in the space industry)


bur3.jpg
 
Buran Shuttle Program was shelved becse of funding problems! Anyway we need something more efficient and cheaper than Shuttles!
 
DemoCoder said:
BTW, achieving Mach1+ briefly with afterburners doesn't count on a fighter. (if fighter could sustain it, it would heat up too much)

SR-71 is a Ramjet built specifically for sustained high speed flight.

The only fighters that can sustain Mach1 fuel-efficiently for long periods is the F-22 and JSF. But even those wouldn't dare go Mach2+ for long.

The EuroFighter Typhoon also has supercruise, and has systems (basically an active flight suit) to ensure the pilot can handle the ~9G that you get will actively fighting at these kind of speeds. Its outclassed by the F-22 but it will enter service earlier, and for that small amount of time, be the most advanced fighter in the world.

I find the brochure very funny, its like they're selling a car not a fighter plane :)
http://www.eurofighter.com/library/documents/Public Folder-2002-1.pdf

Some choice quotes
"Rugged, robust and agile, Eurofighter Typhoon is built and equipped to fly the mission, hit the target and get home safely"
"The low long-term cost of ownership combined with a built-in growth plan means the Eurofighter Typhoon is the only real combat aircraft choice for Air Forces both today and tomorrow"

:) :)

And I thought LCO was an IT thing :)
 
Link

VA-111 Shkval underwater rocket

In 1995 it was revealed that Russia had developed an exceptionally high-speed unguided underwater missile which has no equivalent in the West. Code-named the Shkval (Squall), the new weapon travels at a velocity that would give a targeted vessel very little chance to perform evasive action. The missile has been characterized as a "revenge" weapon, which would be fired along the bearing of an incoming enemy torpedo. The Shkval may be considered a follow-on to the Russian BGT class of evasion torpedoes, which are fired in the direction of an incoming torpedo to try to force an attacking to evade (and hopefully snap the torpedo's guidance wires). The weapon was deployed in the early 1990s, and had been in service for years when the fact of its existence was disclosed.

Development begain in the 1960s, when the Research Institute NII-24 (Chief Designer Mikhail Merkulov) involved in the artillery ammunition research was instructed to launch the development of underwater high-speed missile to fight nuclear-powered submarines. On 14 May 1969, pursuant to a government resolution, NII-24 and GSKB-47 merged into the Research Institute of Applied Hydromechanics (NII PGM), which formed the basis of the present day 'Region' Scientific Production Association. Advances in the development of jet engines and fuel technologies, as well as outstanding results in the research of body motion under cavitation made it possible to design a unique missile with a dived speed much greater than that of conventional torpedoes.
When the suction on the low-pressure side of the propeller blade dips below ambient pressure [atmospheric plus hydrostatic head] the propeller blade cavitates -- a vacuum cavity forms. There is water vapor in the cavity, and the pressure is not a true vacuum, but equal to the vapor pressure of the water. High-speed propellers are often designed to operate in a fully-cavitating (supercavitating) mode. A high speed supercavitating projectile, while moving in the forward direction, rotates inside the cavity. This rotation leads to a series of impacts between the projectile tail and the cavity wall. The impacts affect the trajectory as well as the stability of motion of the projectile. The present paper discusses the in-flight dynamics of such a projectile. Despite the impacts with the cavity wall, the projectile nearly follows a straight line path. The frequency of the impacts between the projectile tail and cavity boundary increases initially, reaches a maximum, and then decreases gradually. The frequency of impacts decreases with the projectile's moment of inertia.

Apparently fired from standard 533mm torpedo tubes, Shkval has a range of about 7,500 yards. The weapon clears the tube at fifty knots, upon which its rocket fires, propelling the missile through the water at 360 kph [about 100 m/sec / 230 mph / 200-knots], three or four times as fast as conventional torpedoes. The solid-rocket propelled "torpedo" achieves high speeds by producing a high-pressure stream of bubbles from its nose and skin, which coats the torpedo in a thin layer of gas and forms a local "envelope" of supercavitating bubbles. Carrying a tactical nuclear warhead initiated by a timer, it would destroy the hostile submarine and the torpedo it fired. The Shkval high-speed underwater missile is guided by an auto-pilot rather than by a homing head as on most torpedoes.

There are no evident countermeasures to such a weapon, its employment could put adversary naval forces as a considerable disadvantage. One such scenario is a rapid attack situation wherein a sudden detection of a threat submarine is made, perhaps at relatively short range, requiring an immediate response to achieve weapon on target and to ensure survival. Apparently guidance is a problem, and the initial version of the Shkval was unguided However, the Russians have been advertising a homing version, which runs out at very high speed, then slows to search.

A prototype of the modernised "Shkval", which was exhibited at the 1995 international armaments show in Abu Dhabi, was discarded. An improved model was designed with a conventional (non-nuclear) warhead and a guided targeting system, which substantially enhances its combat effectiveness. The first tests of the modernised Shkval torpedo were held by the Russian Pacific Fleet in the spring of 1998.

The 'Region' Scientific Production Association has developed developed an export modification of the missile, 'Shkval-E'. Russia began marketing this conventionally armed version of the Shkval high-speed underwater rocket at the IDEX 99 exhibition in Abu Dhabi in early 1999. The concept of operations for this missile requires the crew of a submarine, ship or the coast guard define the target's parameters -- speed, distance and vector -- and feeds the data to the missile's automatic pilot. The missile is fired, achieves its optimum depth and switches on its engines. The missile does not have a homing warhead and follows a computer-generated program.

On 05 April 2000 the Russian Federal Security Service [FSB] in Moscow arrested an American businessman, Edmond Pope, and a Russian accomplice, on charges of stealing scientific secrets. A FSB statement said it confiscated "technical drawings of various equipment, recordings of his conversations with Russian citizens relating to their work in the Russian defense industry, and receipts for American dollars received by them." Pope, a retired US Navy captain who spent much of his career working in naval intelligence, was at the time of his arrest the head of a private security firm. On 20 April 2000 the FSB revealed that Pope had been seeking plans the Shkval underwater missile. Pope was detained during an informal contact with a Russian scientist who had participated in the Shkval's creation.

The arrest of Daniel Howard Kiely, deputy head of the Applied Research Laboratory at Pennsylvania State University, came almost simultaneously. The laboratory led by Mr. Kiely has for many years been developing torpedoes for US warships and submarines. Professor Kiely had joined Pope in Moscow to offer technical advice and determine the tasks for Pope's further activity. Kiely was interrogated as a witness. His testimony and objects confiscated during the search proved his involvement in Pope's activities. Later the 68-year-old professor was released and allowed to return to the United States.
The objective of the High-Speed Undersea Weaponry project at the US Office of Naval Research is to develop the vehicle guidance, control and maneuvering capabilities for the quick reaction weapons. High-speed weapons could offer an advantage for Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW) "close encounter" scenarios. The overall system response of a high-speed weapon for breaking off engagements with enemy submarines would be measured in seconds, rather than minutes. The High-Speed Undersea Weapons project has three tasks; Vehicle Guidance, Vehicle Control, and Test Bed Development. Vehicle Guidance deals with homing sensors, signal processing, waveform design, and autopilot commands that are used to guide (either autonomously or with external interaction) the weapon to its target. Vehicle control deals with control and maneuvering of the high-speed weapon with emphasis on stabilizing the supercavitating bubble cavity, and optimizing the flow for low drag. Technical issues include instability due to vehicle planing and tail slap, interaction between cavity with propulsion exhaust, and propulsion system transients, including startup. Test Bed Development is an ongoing effort that develops a test platform to test and evaluate S&T candidate systems such as homing systems, vehicle control, and propulsion systems.
 
Back
Top