I just don't see how this will behave like a 1.6 TFLOPs RDNA2 GPU given the 44GB/s split between 4*Zen2 cores and the iGPU.
Moreover the 4*Zen2 cores are probably coming with only 4MB L3 so they'll need to hit the LPDDR5 more often than Cezanne. At least Tiger Lake comes with 12MB L3 of which the Xe iGPU is also a client.
And why didn't they push for LPDDR5 6400MT/s, if memory bandwidth was so constrained?
This was looking like
the thing I had been longing for in many years, but now I'm super skeptical about it. Unless I'm missing something, those pre-orders are going to fall once benchmarks for the handheld start pouring in.
I guess I should start redirecting my anticipation to handhelds using Rembrandt U and Alder Lake U..
RMB = Right Mouse Button? Raster.. erm.. Memory Buffer?
I also don't get how
Van Gogh at 162mm^2 ended up being larger than the 156mm^2 Renoir with 128bit memory and 8 Zen2 cores, considering it has half the memory PHYs and half the die area dedicated to CPU cores.
Even if Van Gogh's RDNA2 8CUs are ~60% larger than Renoir's GCN5 8CUs, it still shouldn't translate into a bigger die.
Here's Renoir's xray edited by me:
View attachment 5744
Where did all the red die area go?