On TechReport's frame latency measurement and why gamers should care

Discussion in '3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices' started by Andrew Lauritzen, Jan 1, 2013.

  1. ninelven

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    152
    Gross.

    We have no evidence that AMD was even aware of these other issues before Ryan brought them to their attention. In fact, if you want to assume they were, it paints them in a rather bad light... I prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt. Surely the customer is entitled to know exactly how the product they have paid for is performing...
     
  2. Andrew Lauritzen

    Andrew Lauritzen Moderator
    Moderator Veteran

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    2,632
    Likes Received:
    1,246
    Location:
    British Columbia, Canada
    They said "frame pacing" doesn't work, but this is not a frame pacing issue. Had they said that Crossfire doesn't work then you'd have a leg to stand on here, but I don't think they'd be willing to make that claim ;)

    A sync issue like this one is a pretty serious problem. Probably not terribly hard to fix, but there's no excuse for it ever happening. The only reason I don't care is because multi-gpu is stupid to start with, as I'm hoping more and more people are starting to see ;)
     
  3. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    I must admit, now that I re-read the article, it's possible they didn't actually test with frame pacing enabled as I previously had somehow understood the article. If they didn't, my apologies to Ryan.
    However, this particular paragraph suggests the tests were in fact done with frame pacing which was clearly mentioned by AMD that it wouldn't work (and despite what it says, I don't understand how anyone could be confused about it since it was clearly mentioned that it's supported only on single display)

     
  4. 3dilettante

    Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8,579
    Likes Received:
    4,799
    Location:
    Well within 3d
    There seem to have been technical hurdles and tool changes necessary to log the multiscreen issues accurately, which I believe the prior PC Perspective piece indicated.
    The author's work, and/or help necessary to set up the new tests has happened to bear fruit right before the next gen announcements.

    Given the visual breaks that result from the syncing problem, I believe AMD--or at least its QA department--has been on the same page as you for quite some time.
     
  5. DSC

    DSC
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    3
    http://techreport.com/blog/25399/here-why-the-crossfire-eyefinity-4k-story-matters

    Looks like the AMD defense force are extremely defensive and working overtime to damage control as more and more sites expose AMD's crappy drivers.
     
  6. Davros

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    17,884
    Likes Received:
    5,334
    I liked this quote
    *imagines Dave begging :D

    ps: Amd treats a 4k display like a 2 display eyefinity setup In fact 2 monitors arranged horizontally
    [​IMG]

    If they treated it like 2 displays arranged vertically
    [​IMG]
    would the tearing be less noticable (or make no difference) ?
     
  7. Dave Baumann

    Dave Baumann Gamerscore Wh...
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    14,090
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    O Canada!
    Davros, the current 4K panels are actually physically two panels arranged in a 2x1 portait configuration. We do not recommend using HDMI to drive the panels - all our recent products support DP1.2 with multi-stream capabilities and the "Eyfinity" tearing is not present in that mode.
     
  8. DuckThor Evil

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    5,996
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Location:
    Finland
    Do you mean they are using two 8:9 1920 X 2160 panels combined to one 16:9 3840 X 2160 display?
     
  9. madyasiwi

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    32
    Microstutter
    Frame-interleave
    4K Bug

    Six month later and instead of getting the original frame latency fixed the problems actually tripled now. Who would've expect it huh?

    What's next? :shock:
     
  10. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    The problems haven't tripled. Your knowledge has.
     
  11. silent_guy

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    I'm pretty sure it's hard to glue 2 pieces of glass together, so I assume it's a single physical 3840x2160 panel, but they have duplicate electrical interfaces that each handle half of the panel.
     
  12. Davros

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    17,884
    Likes Received:
    5,334
    The cards may be but are the monitors ???
    I found the explaination as to why they are two panels (or possibly 1 panel but electrically its 2 if you know what I mean)

    edit: the asus in the quote does have dp why did they not use it does it require a mst hub and they didnt have one ?
    fook me they are £100 no wonder, but then again amd cards all have 2 dp outputs
     
  13. Dave Baumann

    Dave Baumann Gamerscore Wh...
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    14,090
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    O Canada!
    To be frank I'm not 100% on the panel situation at the moment, I believe they should all have DP and HDMI inputs if they are targeting 60Hz 40K.

    No, the hub is built into the panel. External hubs are required for supporting multiple panels, the 4K panels take a single DP cable input and then split between the internal panels with an internal hub. In other words, why would anyone use two HDMI cables to a single panel when you can use a single DP?
     
  14. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,716
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Location:
    London
    Why would a dual-HDMI configuration not work on AMD when it works on NVidia?
     
  15. Davros

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    17,884
    Likes Received:
    5,334
    nv has some sort of lock sync on each scanline
     
  16. Malo

    Malo Yak Mechanicum
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Messages:
    8,931
    Likes Received:
    5,533
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    How would HDCP work with 2 HDMI?
     
  17. Davros

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    17,884
    Likes Received:
    5,334
    afaik all hdcp content is at a res that is supported by a single hdmi cable
     
  18. DuckThor Evil

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    5,996
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Location:
    Finland
    Dave how is the Crossfire Eyefinity/4K fix coming up? :)
    I have some 7990s coming my way that need a little sorting out. I read somewhere that we should expect something in november, is that still case or can you comment this in any way?
     
  19. gl33k

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    1
    can you crossfire 2x 7990 ?
     
  20. lanek

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Yes, this bring you to QuadCFX..
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...