Nvidia's 3000 Series RTX GPU [3090s with different memory capacity]

Has anyone put an actual necktie on one of these TI editions as a joke about the nVidia guy mispronouncing it yet? If not the GPU community is losing a bit of its edge.

I would 'cept I don't have any TI cards. I could put a cape on my kids 2060 super I guess...
 
3090 Super has only 2.5% more cores than normal 3090, I'm not sure that justifies Super moniker
If we go by what Super meant for 20 series then it's mostly a price cut and lass of a performance improvement.
But in current market that'd make little sense so I dunno.
My expectations were that they'll just add 16 and 20-22 GB SKUs in place of 8 and 10 ones.
So far rumors seem to be all over the place though.
 
3090 Super has only 2.5% more cores than normal 3090, I'm not sure that justifies Super moniker
They don't have to justify it. All they need to do is increase the MSRP and make more profit since in the current market it will sell anyway.

A 16gb 3070ti is ideal for me as I really need the extra VRAM and the gaming performance is right where I want it for my upgrade. It's a pity I'll never be able to get one, likely until the 4070 is released.
 
The large memory would be super nice for machine learning stuff.

But when they will be available at MSRP hahahaha
 
Interesting, I wonder what's the price performance compared to rtx?
And it's compatibility as it requires tensor flow converted to tensor flow lite, and doesn't seems to have Cuda
 
Additional Software -

Nvidia Canvas (BETA) - https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/studio/canvas/

Nvidia Desktop Software RTX Manager - https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/software/rtx-desktop-manager

Nvidia RTX Experience - NVIDIA RTX Experience: The Ultimate NVIDIA RTX Productivity Companion | NVIDIA

Nvidia RTX Voice - NVIDIA RTX Voice: Setup Guide | GeForce News | NVIDIA
Is there any meaningly performance loss using it on gtx 10 series cards?
While using RTX Voice in Teams, I notice about 6% GPU utilization on my 1650 ti mobile, which isn't a powerful GPU. About 800Mb of VRAM used by it. Co-workers agree that it sounds great and removed the road noise around my house very well. No performance loss noticed as Teams uses my iGPU for drawing frames.

Nvidia Broadcast - https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/broadcasting/broadcast-app/

Nvidia Geforce Experience BETA - https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/geforce-experience/beta/

Nvidia Geforce Now - https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce-now/download/
 
508x253_PR_A2000-1.jpg


In real-world apps, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 offered excellent performance. For the zillions of architects and designers out there working in SketchUp and pairing that app to real-time rendering solutions like Enscape and Twinmotion, the A2000’s ability to fit into Small Form Factor (SFF) workstations is a huge benefit for the GPU.

We also like the RTX A2000’s tessellation scores. For surface and solids modeling in CAID and MCAD workflows, the tiny GPU offers excellent performance, almost matching a Quadro RTX 4000 in OpenGL tessellation performance. The VRMark score demonstrates that despite its tiny size, the RTX A2000 can power most VR headsets. For those interested in Varjo’s industrial-grade VR-3 / XR-3 headsets, and above, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 doesn’t quite fit the bill. NVIDIA’s new RTX A2000 isn’t aimed at the high-end market where Varjo’s gear plays.

For V-Ray users, the RTX A2000 generates 1.8 – 2.1 Vrays per USD, compared to 1.95 Vrays per USD for the RTX 3070. On the OpenGL tessellation level, the RTX A2000 is an even better value performer. The variability in the 1.8 – 2.1 Vrays measure depends on if users can grab an A2000 for USD 450 or the USD 525 we saw online. Sometimes folks automatically think that getting the least expensive option among a selection of options means you get less dollar value. In this particular case, the A2000 delivers excellent value.

Costs: 450 USD MSRP

Product Review: NVIDIA RTX A2000 GPU for Workstations Architosh
 
Back
Top