Nvidia Turing Product Reviews and Previews: (2080TI, 2080, 2070, 2060, 1660, etc)

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Ike Turner, Aug 21, 2018.

  1. Benetanegia

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    123
    I know that we're in a graphics centric forum, but honestly why is the discussion about benefits of RT reflections so limited to IQ? The biggest advantage that I saw or thought about RT reflections, the moment I saw them in the BF V demos back then were related to gameplay, being able to see people behind you and such...
     
    OCASM, pharma and DavidGraham like this.
  2. DavidGraham

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,570
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Not just behind you, I can spot people on the reflection of floors and puddles even though they are not directly in my line of sight, in the mansion of Rotterdam I can cover a certain door while spotting enemies peaking from the windows to the sides of it on the floor.
     
    #482 DavidGraham, Jan 10, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
  3. pharma

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    I do not know the facts, but if Hardware Unboxed signed Nvidia's NDA and did not break a recent agreement then they should have received a card unless there was a review shortage (which does happen). Other than that they might have to get in queue similar to sites like phoronix.com, which tend to post reviews much later than mainstream sites.
     
  4. Benetanegia

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    123
    BTW I decided to check this conspiracy thing about reviewers not doing 4K for myself and out of the 5 that I have bookmarked and typically use for reviews: Anandtech, TechPowerUp, Guru3D, Tom's Hardware and PcPerspective, only Tom's didn't do 4K. I fail to see the conspiracy, sorry. I'm pretty sure those are among the biggest tech sites, top 10 surely... If Nvidia didn't want us to know 4K performance, they did a really poor job, IMO.
     
  5. milk

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2,649
    Likes Received:
    2,114
    If this is anything like review guidelines for games, and I believe it is, they might not have an actual contract, but effectively they pretty much have an unwritten one.
    Gaming publications receive review copies for free and way before launch, but under guidelines of when they can post content (the famous review embargo) what content they can show or what should not be spoiled etc. Aledgedly, these guidelines have been getting more and more specific through the ages as well. There is nothing keeping a reviewer from breaking those guidelines and do whatever the fuck he wants, they don't sign a contract (or as far as I know, they didn't do it the last time I saw journalists talk about that) but they get sort of black-listed with that publisher and will have less media access to future news from them, like: less opportunities for interviews, preview events, exclusive videos, and in extreme cases they might not even get review copies for the next few games from that publisher, meaning they would have to wait for the consumer launch of a title to even start playing it to wright a review, if they even wanna bother at that point. Some journalists that have consistently broken these types of guidelines even started being black listed by publishers they didn't even break any guidelines with directly, but they had become so infamous other companies were just being more cautious about those guys.
    So yeah, if the relationship of hardware manufacturers and journalists is any similar, it's not far fetched to think that, even if there isn't a explicit contract legally keeping reviewers from breaking the guidelines, they have strong incentives to follow them. The consequence of going against Nvidia could mean them not getting their review copy as early as his competitors next time.
     
  6. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    39,695
    Likes Received:
    9,744
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    It's not that far fetched, but that's not really a useful discussion point for this thread as it'll apply to every hardware review thread. That discussion should be held in its own thread and reviews just discussed as we find them.
     
    pharma and BRiT like this.
  7. ToTTenTranz

    Legend Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,409
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    (I had posted this on this thread but it was teleported elsewhere, so here goes again: )


    Looking at the mobile versions on the just announced MSI laptops, it seems the RTX 2060 model uses the same 180W adapter as it was needed for the GTX 1070 Max-Q model.

    It'll be interesting to see how the GTX 1070 Max-Q compares to the laptop RTX 2060, but so far it points out to Turing being substantially more power efficient than Pascal, at lower TDPs.
     
    vipa899 likes this.
  8. w0lfram

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2017
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    23
    Are you saying you couldn't see those things before, because they were not clear enough..? Or are you saying RTX adds players into the reflections, instead of offering more fidelity..?

    I have always seen such things in my reflection and shadows. I just never cared how detailed they were in a FPS game because you don't have time to actually look at such thing, only react.
     
  9. pharma

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OC review
    https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/palit_geforce_rtx_2060_gamingpro_oc_review,1.html
     
    vipa899 likes this.
  10. milk

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    2,649
    Likes Received:
    2,114
    Without RT players are only reflected if they apear directly on screen. With RTX, it's possible to have scenarios where you see reflctions of players that are not directly on screen, affording a possible advantage on those scenarios.
     
    pharma and A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y like this.
  11. Picao84

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,287
    Likes Received:
    512
    Rumours everywhere today stating that the GTX1660Ti will be only 20% faster than a GTX1060, while costing more or less the same. Lame. AMD please come back, we've missed you. Preferably with a GTX1660Ti competitor that mops the floor with it. Plenty of space between it and the GTX2060 to cover.
     
  12. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    Location:
    Finland
    It was ATOS bench with mobile version (GTX 1060 in comparison is the mobile variant too, of course)
     
  13. ToTTenTranz

    Legend Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,409
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    Looks like GTX Turing is real:

    [​IMG]

    GTX 16xx family incoming.
    Remains to be seen if these are repurposed TU106 chips or TU116 is in fact real.

    If there are no RT units in there, I wonder what differentiates it from Volta.
    GDDR6? Turing also has an incremental update to the tensor units IIRC.
     
    Lightman, BRiT and vipa899 like this.
  14. vipa899

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2017
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    352
    Location:
    Sweden
    I wouldnt buy a 1660 over a 2060, its essentially a low end gpu akin to 1050/ti at a higher price. Without RT its less future proof.

    Nvidia has nice gpus, but their pricing is really annoying.
     
  15. CarstenS

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    4,758
    Likes Received:
    1,994
    Location:
    Germany
    Standard-Volta would have half-rate FP64 as well as more L1. And yes, it's Tensors would not be able to accelerate Inferencing Workloads with INT8/INT4 precision as much. If the small chip is using standard Volta ingredients, that is.
     
    BRiT and ToTTenTranz like this.
  16. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    185
    Improved rasterizer?
     
  17. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    Location:
    Finland
    Supposedly Tensors are cut off too
     
  18. pharma

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Last I heard it was still in the air whether tensors were included, which is likely since they would be needed for DLSS.
     
  19. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    Location:
    Finland
    They could just aswell want to keep DLSS as buying incentive for the more expensive RTX cards.
    Assuming TU116 chip is indeed separate chip I don't think it can really be 'in the air', they either included the cores on the chip or they didn't
     
    no-X likes this.
  20. Dr Evil

    Dr Evil Anas platyrhynchos
    Legend Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    5,728
    Likes Received:
    724
    Location:
    Finland
    It has to be a smaller chip and they will probably use it for more SKUs. No chance they will go close or under $200 with a 445mm2 chip. Maybe around 250mm2 for this one.
     
    pharma likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...