Nvidia G71 - rumours, questions and whatnot

Discussion in 'Pre-release GPU Speculation' started by ToxicTaZ, Dec 4, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ChrisRay

    ChrisRay <span style="color: rgb(124, 197, 0)">R.I.P. 1983-
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,234
    Likes Received:
    26
    Those 3dmark scores do seem a bit strange. Considering how normally GPU limited 3dmark03
    is with little variation from CPU. For comparisons sake. My 7800GTX SLI setup scores 26000+ In 3dmark03.
     
  2. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    What were the numbers? The pics no longer show.
     
  3. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    Obviously we haven't seen any benchmarks yet. . .but, err, is it just me or is it looking like 7900GT in sli might be the. . .well, "price/performance" champ in NV's lineup at the top? Which sounds odd at $700, but it seems like it might be. . .
     
  4. Sxotty

    Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    5,496
    Likes Received:
    866
    Location:
    PA USA
    Yeah, but only in certain games, we already all know the drawbacks to multiGPU systems :D
     
  5. IbaneZ

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    17
    Yeah, it looks like SLI didn't "kick in". :) But then again, I doubt that a single 7900GT will score 8500 in 05 with such a slow CPU. Bit if thats the case, G71 looks pretty good. Feed it with a highend CPU and it's gonna rock in 3dmark-05/06.
     
  6. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    A 7900GT is basically equivalent spec-wise to the 450Mhz eVGA 7800GTX that I had previously and that scored in the high 7000's in 3dmark05 so either there are some efficiency gains somewhere or those numbers are bogus.
     
  7. Subtlesnake

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    126
    Or maybe SLI is working fine, but it's being held back by the CPU.
     
  8. _xxx_

    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,008
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Hey, feels like home! :lol:
     
  9. _xxx_

    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,008
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    I can't see the scores since you guys sucked all their bandwidth ;), but with such a slow CPU, definitely.

    I'll wait for the official reviews before I put any bets.
     
  10. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    Nope. 3dmark05 and 06 are heavily GPU bound. It would take a much slower CPU than that to bring dual-GT's down to that level. That 7900GT score is only 9% faster than a 7800GTX - it is obviously from a single card. I think it's been confirmed in the original thread at xtremesystems that there is a driver bug preventing SLI from working in 05/06.

    3dmark03 which is more CPU bound than 05 IIRC scaled nicely so it is obviously not the CPU.
     
    #1690 trinibwoy, Mar 3, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2006
  11. _xxx_

    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,008
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Then please explain why my 3DM05 scores have almost doubled when I switched from AthlonXP3000+ to Athlon64 35090+? With the 6800GT.
     
  12. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    That's strange because I had a 6800GT as well and I was maxing it out on 3dmark05 with a AthlonXP @ 2.4Ghz. And it is a bit naive to think that a A64 3000+ is that much of a bottleneck.

    Anyway, for comparison -
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/evga-7800gtx_22.html 26258 3dmark03
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/evga-7800gtx_24.html 11321 3dmark05

    Link to GT benches - http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1026359

    Notice how the 3dmark03 scores are in line (7%) with dual-7800's but the 3dmark05 score is much lower (33%) compared to the same configuration? Don't you think 3dmark03 would have been severely hampered by the CPU as well?
     
    #1692 trinibwoy, Mar 3, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2006
  13. IbaneZ

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    17
    #1693 IbaneZ, Mar 3, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2006
  14. Arty

    Arty KEPLER
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    55
    Those scores are definitely not right, the Asus Dual 7800GT scores 27067 in '03 and 11348 in '05.
     
  15. {Sniping}Waste

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    29
    Location:
    Garland TX
    05 and 06 are CPU bottleneck in SLI. ppl at XtremeSystems proved that. Therer is a nice point increce when using duel core CPU in 05 and 06 at slower speeds then a single core CPU. Both are CPU bottleneck now with the newer video cards out now.
     
  16. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    Are you saying that 3dmark03 is less CPU bound than 05 and 06 in SLI? I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say.
     
  17. karlotta

    karlotta pifft
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    oregon
    is that all you changed? H/W? and the same drivers? Where both fresh xp installs? and im sure your settings where the same.. default 3dmark?
     
  18. KimB

    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,928
    Likes Received:
    230
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
  19. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    Well there were a couple recent patents regarding memory efficiency. One was on partitioning and another was on simulating multi-ported memory using less transistors than "real" multi-ported memory as seen in Xenos/R520. Haven't seen anything to indicate that they beefed up the pipelines though.

    Although, those numbers might just be screwy for whatever reason (fake, bad drivers etc) and the 7900GT might simply just match the 7800GTX.
     
  20. dizietsma

    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    13
    Well 05 is cpu bound in GT1 and GT2 for SLi whereas 03 is cpu bound for modern cards in GT1 but not cpu bound for GT2,3 and 4 where the vast majority of the points are.

    03 is less cpu bound than 05 IMO. The best test for a video card now in my opinion is nature ( GT4) in 03 and the SM3 tests in 06. Take those together and you get a good indication of gpu performance in shader heavy DX9 games.
     
    #1700 dizietsma, Mar 3, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2006
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...