Jak 2

Anonymous

Veteran
Ive played demo of jak2 and i have to say that this is the most technically advanced game on ps2 to date(xbox can dream), release date: 14.october

jak 1 - character - 3,000 polys

jak 2 - character - 12,000 - 15,000 polys + bump-mapping

and i dont comment enviroment and draw distance :oops:
Constant 60fps is obvious...

NAUGHTY DOG are one of the best developers around...+ konami + polyphony
 
Code:
STANDARD USENET BONEHEAD REPLY FORM (version 9.5) [modified]  ----
Written by: John Henry
(check all boxes that apply)

 Dear:
   [X] Clueless Newbie
   [X] Troller
   [ ] "Me too"-er
   [ ] Inconsiderate poster
   [ ] Spammer
   [X] Dumbass
   [ ] Racist
   [ ] Expert on everything (EOE)
   [ ] Flamethrower

You Are Being Flamed Because:

   [X] You obviously don't know anything about the topic at hand
   [ ] You started a long, stupid thread
   [ ] You continued spreading a long stupid thread
   [ ] You started a thread that has been discussed here continuously
           for the last year and a half
   [ ] Your post is absurdly off topic for where you posted it
   [ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
   [X] You posted low-IQ flamebait
   [X] You posted a blatantly obvious troll
   [ ] You followed up to a blatantly obvious troll
   [X] You said "X rules, Y sucks" and gave no support for your lame
           statement
   [ ] You said "me too" to something and added NOTHING to the
          discussion
   [X] You make no sense
   [ ] You posted the same text multiple times
   [ ] You made a post yet failed to say anything
   [ ] You posted a phone-sex ad
   [ ] You posted "upside down" by just adding your comments to the
         top of the previous post
   [ ] You seem to dumb to learn to trim your posts
   [ ] You posted SCREAMING in RANDOM CAPS (OR IN ALL
          CAPS) for NO APPARENT REASON
   [ ] You posted a 1 line reply with PAGES of unnecessary quoted text
   [ ] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally
          worthless that you are being flamed anyway
   [ ] You gave bad or dangerous advice

  To Repent, You Must:

   [X] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea what you're
        doing
   [X] READ every post in this group for two weeks so you can get an
           idea about what is discussed here
   [ ] Give up your AOL account
   [ ] Give up your WebTV account
   [ ] Bust up your modem with a hammer and eat it
   [ ] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor (monitor must be
          plugged in)
   [X] Actually post something relevant
   [ ] Learn to format your posts properly so we can read them
   [ ] Nothing, we'll let you go this time

  In Closing, I'd Like to Say:

   [X] Get a clue
   [X] Get a life
   [X] Go away
   [X] Grow up
   [X] Never post again
   [X] You need to seek psychiatric help
   [X] Like a neutered dog, you just don't get it
   [X] Take your gibberish somewhere else
   [X] Go back to school and actually learn something
   [X] Learn how to post or get off the Internet
   [X] Don't take offence at this, I just like to use this form
   [X] All of the above
 
arhra said:
Code:
STANDARD USENET BONEHEAD REPLY FORM (version 9.5) [modified]  ----
Written by: John Henry
(check all boxes that apply)

 Dear:
   [X] Clueless Newbie
   [X] Troller
   [ ] "Me too"-er
   [ ] Inconsiderate poster
   [ ] Spammer
   [X] Dumbass
   [ ] Racist
   [ ] Expert on everything (EOE)
   [ ] Flamethrower

You Are Being Flamed Because:

   [X] You obviously don't know anything about the topic at hand
   [ ] You started a long, stupid thread
   [ ] You continued spreading a long stupid thread
   [ ] You started a thread that has been discussed here continuously
           for the last year and a half
   [ ] Your post is absurdly off topic for where you posted it
   [ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
   [X] You posted low-IQ flamebait
   [X] You posted a blatantly obvious troll
   [ ] You followed up to a blatantly obvious troll
   [X] You said "X rules, Y sucks" and gave no support for your lame
           statement
   [ ] You said "me too" to something and added NOTHING to the
          discussion
   [X] You make no sense
   [ ] You posted the same text multiple times
   [ ] You made a post yet failed to say anything
   [ ] You posted a phone-sex ad
   [ ] You posted "upside down" by just adding your comments to the
         top of the previous post
   [ ] You seem to dumb to learn to trim your posts
   [ ] You posted SCREAMING in RANDOM CAPS (OR IN ALL
          CAPS) for NO APPARENT REASON
   [ ] You posted a 1 line reply with PAGES of unnecessary quoted text
   [ ] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally
          worthless that you are being flamed anyway
   [ ] You gave bad or dangerous advice

  To Repent, You Must:

   [X] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea what you're
        doing
   [X] READ every post in this group for two weeks so you can get an
           idea about what is discussed here
   [ ] Give up your AOL account
   [ ] Give up your WebTV account
   [ ] Bust up your modem with a hammer and eat it
   [ ] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor (monitor must be
          plugged in)
   [X] Actually post something relevant
   [ ] Learn to format your posts properly so we can read them
   [ ] Nothing, we'll let you go this time

  In Closing, I'd Like to Say:

   [X] Get a clue
   [X] Get a life
   [X] Go away
   [X] Grow up
   [X] Never post again
   [X] You need to seek psychiatric help
   [X] Like a neutered dog, you just don't get it
   [X] Take your gibberish somewhere else
   [X] Go back to school and actually learn something
   [X] Learn how to post or get off the Internet
   [X] Don't take offence at this, I just like to use this form
   [X] All of the above

That should be applied to you. Get a life
 
qwerty2000 said:
That should be applied to you. Get a life

Ok, explain this to me. Someone comes in here and makes a post that's utterly flamebate with comments like "Xbox can dream" and you have the balls to defend him and talk shit? Give me a break...
 
Vince:
The "xbox can dream" should just be ignored by everyone with the least bit of common sense (xboxers included), Arha's comment was just WAY out of line.

Definitely worthy of an instant kickban if you ask me.


I don't think there's anyone that doubts Jak2's visuals will be impressive as heck and a marked step up from the previous incarnation. Wether xbox can dream or not, well, who cares really. I'm gonna get this game, that's for sure. :)


*G*
 
Grall said:
The "xbox can dream" should just be ignored by everyone with the least bit of common sense (xboxers included), Arha's comment was just WAY out of line.

What in Arha's comment was factually incorrect? Way out of line for posting something which is not only funny but correct? Give me a break, seriously. Did you even see this guys post before he edited it? Pure flame...

When you ban Chap, then we'll talk about Arha.
 
Jezz, lighten up, people...

did you all miss the
Code:
[X] Don't take offence at this, I just like to use this form
line? ;)

I'm sure Jak2 will be technically impressive, the first one was, after all (not to mention being probably my favourite platform game this generation), and i can't see things getting any worse... Not too keen on the direction they're taking it, personally (mainly the weapons - i really didn't like ratchet and clank much), but i'll probably give them the benefit of the doubt.

ps. There are two "R"s in my nick. For some reason, people always miss one or the other :?
 
'15000 polys', 'bump-mapping', '60fps', 'PS2'.

Which one looks out of place here? I'm sorry, Dotty.. but you've gotta go.
 
...(xbox can dream), ...


hey ! that make some sense.


jakanddaxter246.jpg


jakanddaxter245.jpg





jakanddaxter243.jpg



jakanddaxter257.jpg
 
Funny... I don't see any bump mapping...

In fact, I don't see any textures at all on most of the characters...
 
Yeay, texturing would have been aWwWesome during the N64 days! :p

Not to mention, the usual PS2 IQ problems(lowres/lowfiltering/lowcolors etc etc) that pops all over PS2 games, making those screens look much better than actual Jax2.

Oh well, an interesting joke post. Nothing worthy though, move along to other topics everyone. :LOL:
 
Blade said:
'15000 polys', 'bump-mapping', '60fps', 'PS2'.

Which one looks out of place here? I'm sorry, Dotty.. but you've gotta go.

Haha, so true.

And friedsnake, incase you're wondering whats with everyones reaction.. ask 'Dotty' ;)
 
Wow, this place is just like Slashdot.

Just raging Wintel freaks with critical moderation status instead of raging GNU freaks.
 
In fact, I don't see any textures at all on most of the characters...

:oops:

You can't!?

Not to mention, the usual PS2 IQ problems(lowres/lowfiltering/lowcolors etc etc)

Low res as opposed to what? HD resolutions? And what is "lowfiltering" and what are "lowcolors"?
 
Low res as opposed to what? HD resolutions? And what is "lowfiltering" and what are "lowcolors"?

probably little or no AA, and the color pallete/scheme used for Jak2 (cartoon not bright shades).
 
Back
Top