Intel progresses with Tiger Lake

Some links about Tiger Lake.

https://www.techradar.com/news/inte...er-twice-the-graphics-performance-of-ice-lake

https://www.techradar.com/news/intel-tiger-lake-leaked-benchmarks-suggest-good-and-bad-news-for-amd

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-tiger-lake-graphics-battlefield-5

https://www.engadget.com/intels-tig...ure-onchip-malware-protections-130024569.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_Lake_(microarchitecture)

I am looking for the 10nm+ and 25TDP fast chips.

 

https://wccftech.com/intel-10nm-cor...vs-amd-7nm-ryzen-4000-upto-20-percent-faster/

If this is true, AMD may have another Core2Duo moment in a near future with Alder Lake.

 

What the hell? The massive difference in clocks between base clock and boost clock. Are current cpus this different? Nearly 2GHz difference.

"The Intel Core i7-1165G7 features four cores, 8 threads that are clocked at a base frequency of 2.8 GHz, and a boost frequency of 4.7 GHz. The CPU features 12 MB of L3 and 5 MB of L2 cache"​

 

Very common for laptop parts.

 

Yup. The implikation being that for anything other than a quick single-threaded burst (benchmark or Java-whatever), your performance will be far from peak. Which is still useful, mind you, but a limitation to keep in mind depending on usage for someone looking to replace a desktop system.

 

Even looking at GB4 results, the top score was with sustained 4.7 GHz and it seems to be an outlier, as others were running around 4.0/4.1 GHz.

Ref: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/search?utf8=✓&q=1165g7

 

Not likely, AMD seem to be far more competitive these days. I don't think there'll be another decade in the wilderness.

 

The small advances in peak performance seem to come at great cost in overall power consumption for Intel.

They really need catch up to TSMC in production capability.

Cheers

 

I hope so. Lack of competition hurts us all. But it's also important to remember than after 3 generation of Ryzen: Zen, Zen+ and Zen 2, AMD has just cached up with a 6 year old Intel arch compromised by a lot of security issues. AMD is competitive because Intel has just been bumping clocks for the past 5 years.

 

Isn't part of problem that Intel's 10-nm can't compete with their own uber-refined 14nm process? I mean Rocket lake is actually a backport of their new architecture designed for 10nm. We've yet to see if increased competition leads to Intel unchained.

 

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/new-35W-tiger-lake-CPUs-spotted