How many polygons do you think PGR3 is pushing?

Discussion in 'Console Technology' started by Hardknock, Jul 27, 2005.

  1. Hardknock

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,203
    Likes Received:
    53
    Okay, this is nothing but baseless speculation on my part. But I find it pretty interesting.

    Recently Bizarre revealed that their cars are made out of 80k polygons. And that they are shooting for 8(or more players).

    Here's a pic of a modeled McLaren F1 that was released toda:
    [​IMG]

    So taking this information into account, at the bare minimum:

    80k * 8 = 640k

    640k * 60fps(rumored) = 38 million 400k Polygons per second for just the cars!

    Now we have to factor in the environments, which I'm guessing could push this over 60 million per second(I'm guessing environments would use a slightly lower number of polys than the cars.)

    Am I calculating this right? Does that sound feasible? Compared to racing games of today, is that a pretty substantial leap? :)
     
  2. Bobbler

    Bobbler Shazbot!
    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,827
    Likes Received:
    29
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    One thing of note:

    The cars won't have 80k visible polygons per car per frame -- the models may be made of ~80k polys but if the game is drawing that many polys that aren't seen then something is wrong :?

    Say you got 20-30k visible polys per car (that's probably being a bit generous as most of the time you're just seeing the back/top of the car) and the calculations change a bit.
     
  3. ralexand

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guess that's when the xenos early z-pass will come in handy when you have alot of overlapping polys in a single frame.
     
  4. Sonic

    Sonic Senior Member
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,878
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Even with 80k polygons for the car models that is still impressive. There should be some type of LOD system put into place so the farther away a car is the less polygons for that model.
     
  5. Farid

    Farid Artist formely known as Vysez
    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,844
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    Paris, France
    As long as Bizarre doesn't communicate the LOD method used in the game, it's pretty uselless to try to do any calculations, I think.
     
  6. Stratowagon

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Half of that 80,000 number is for the car interior, and most likely the only time you will be seeing the interior in full detail is when the camera is inside the car, and that can only be for one car at a time obviously. When you are outside the car, the interior will probably be greatly reduced in detail so you only see things like the driver and a very basic (and darkened) representation of seats, the dash, etc.

    Outside the car, the 40,000 exterior polygons will only be at maximum detail. As the car gets further away, I'm sure there will be some smart LOD system that will greatly reduce the number of polys in use.

    And further, only about half of the current LOD polys will be facing the camera, and the other half are simply back-culled.
     
  7. hughJ

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    263
    Especially for the interior, I can't see there being a whole lot of need for modeling the speedometer/odometer when you're in the heli-cam 100feet up.
     
  8. DotProduct

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Will a game like PGR3 really use sophisticated LOD?
    I do not think so.

    I am pretty sure there will be only one type of car modell + interior and maybe 1 or 2 low poly versions for helicopter shots or when you see your competitors very far away.

    True LOD tends to create really ugly artefacts in realtime applications. Some people may know Sega Extreme Sports which had really cool Terrain LOD, which allowed huge/realisitic terrains, but let to ugly artefacts everytime detail increased/decreased.

    Basicly you can´t use different LODs for the same camara shoot. You will get artefacts when you get near the object, unless your LOD is extremly smooth, which is (imo) unrealistic for current games like PGR3.

    You need some sort of geometry mip mapping. For heightmaps (or their generalization: geometry maps) this is in principle very easy, but still leads to artefacts in praxis.
     
  9. Dural

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm pretty sure 12 car races has already been announced.
     
  10. MechanizedDeath

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    8
    I don't know why they wouldn't. You're talking about the ability to bump up the number of vehicles in the game by doing so. You could save at least 2 cars' worth of verts by using LOD. It's not like you could ever make out all the detail in all 8 cars at once, so I don't see why not. As you say, make the LOD smooth. This is a case for all games. But for racing games, so little of the car animates that it only makes sense. With he polygon power of these systems, I think it would be even easier than last gen since you wouldn't have to hack off as much for a lower-detail model. They could also use HOS models and dynamically tesselate, but that's probably not reasonable to expect in a launch game with a tight schedule. PEACE.
     
  11. AlBran

    AlBran Ferro-Fibrous
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    20,727
    Likes Received:
    5,820
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ
    Well, let's say at the start of the race where all the cars are together... would there even be LOD used at this point? We could take this as the worst case scenario....
     
  12. scooby_dooby

    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    8,563
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    E-town, Alberta
    mimimum 8, hopefully more...
     
  13. DotProduct

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is a very good argument against LOD in games, because it is always about steady 30 Frames in the worst case scenario.

    And when there is the possibilty of 8/12 cars all together in front of the player, than the engine has to be able to handle it.

    The same argument is valid for sophisticated occlusion culling, too. What is the benefit of sparing GPU power 90% of the time, when the player can stand on a hill and see everything?

    Both LOD and ocusion culling only make sense, when you design the game/level itself so that such worst case scenarios can´t happen.

    But from experience I would say that most exisiting outdoor games have neither sophisticated non trivial occlusion culling nor continues LOD.

    One reason is that you often have to deal with worst cases where occlusion culling and LOD does not help.
     
  14. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    10,873
    Likes Received:
    767
    Location:
    London
    Operation Flashpoint has a very tweakable terrain and model LOD system, which also includes whether trees or vehicles cast shadows, max distance for shadow rendering, desired frame-rate range, overall view distance (upto 5 kilometres)...

    Jawed
     
  15. Wunderchu

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Burnaby, B.C., Canada
    on a related note, Bizarre mentioned that the Brooklyn Bridge structure in PGR3 contains as much polygons as an entire city in PGR2/1...
     
  16. Iron Tiger

    Regular

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    SoCal
    I still think PGR3 has a very "aggressive" LOD management engine in place.
     
  17. 3roxor

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    3
    It sure looks like it.
     
  18. CMcK

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bonny Scotland
    There is an article on PGR3 in this months EDGE.

    The cars are composed of 40k polygons for the interior and 40k for the exterior. Brooklyn Bridge is 600k polygons and Manhattan Bridge 1 million polygons.

    Bizzare are aiming for 60fps. They also mention the draw distance for one of the unnamed cities is 3km.

    For reference one of the Tokyo tracks in MSR took up just 90k polygons in its entirety.
     
  19. !eVo!-X Ant UK

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    3
    Did'nt they say 40k for exterior and another 40k for the interior.
    But do bear in mind that not all of those will be visable, i say 35k will be visable, and wont the enviroment be normal mapped???
    thus saving polys.
     
  20. The GameMaster

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well let's see... this is an interesting question...

    All figures are PER FRAME and not PER SECOND and figures do not include occusion culling.

    *Vehicle Interiors > ~40,000 polygons (+- 5,000) per frame
    *Vehicle Exteriors > ~40,000 polygons (+- 5,000) per frame
    *Vehicle Driver > ~5,000 polygons (+- 1,000) per frame
    *Average Spectator - ~2,000 polygons (+- 1,000) per frame
    *Enviroment Average (including ambient objects) > ~2,000,000 polygons (+- 500,000) per frame
    *Average number of spectators on screen > 250 (x2000 polygons each) = 500,000 polygons (+- 250,000) per frame
    *Average number of vehicles on screen > 8 (times the total polygon count of vehicle interior/exterior/driver which is 85,000 (+- 11,000) X8) = 680,000 polygons (+- 88,000) per frame

    TOTAL: 3,180,000 polygons PER FRAME(+- 838,000) or a total range of 2,342,000 to 4,018,000 polygons PER FRAME.
    Extrapolated to POLYGONS PER SECOND: At 30FPS= PPS range of 70,260,000 to 120,540,000 polygons/second and at 60FPS= PPS range of 140,520,000 to 241,080,000 polygons/second.

    Not bad for a first generation game!

    Think of it like this... each CAR pushes over 4.8 million polygons per second (again assuming 60fps)... almost as many polygons as an entire GAME from this generation (for reference an average high end XBox game pushes roughly 150K-200K polygons/frame at 30fps or basically 4.5-6 million polygons/second and your average high end PS2 game pushes 100K-150K polygons/frame at 30fps or 3-4.5 million polygons/second). I would like to stress that this *IS* within what ATI/Microsoft indicated the polygon performance of the XBox360 system would attain in a actual game enviroment. Microsoft/ATI stated roughly 500,000,000 polygons/second of actual game performance, but based on stated efficiency claims I would estimate 90% of stated performance so a maximum of roughly 450,000,000 polygons/second of actual performance.
     
    #20 The GameMaster, Aug 1, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 1, 2005
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...