HD 4870 review thread.

Discussion in '3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices' started by mczak, Jun 24, 2008.

  1. Broken Hope

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    England
    Is there any explanation why ATI cards seem to be able to handle high resolutions with AA well without needing over 512MB of RAM? Are ATI drivers/cards just more efficient with memory? It's just seems odd that Nvidia needs over 512MB of Video RAM.
     
  2. tuteja1986

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Australia , Sydney

    lopri :
    "Say, in a hypothetical situation:

    - Card A (512MB): constantly (quickly) moves or reuses 300MB of buffer efficiently thanks to extremely high bandwidth and smart design
    - Card B (1GB): slow to switch frame buffers or constantly redraws same buffers again and again (brute force) "


    As for AA performance read this page :
    http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/atirv770/architecture/index.php?p=6

    [​IMG]

    "The RBE were another primary focus for improvement, mainly in order to increase AA performance, another R600 weak-point. Gone is the dedicated alpha/fog unit-it's use was rather questionable in terms of benefits anyhow. Depth and stencil capacity is doubled, which means that the RV770 is actually capable of Quad-Z/Stencil rates"

    "RBE improvements are centered around this area: the RV770 handles 4AA samples per clock and is thus capable of outputting 16 pixels per clock even with 4X AA, whereas the R600 could only manage 2 samples per clock, which resulted in it outputting only 8 pixels per clock with AA enabled. This means an overall doubling of fillrate with AA compared to the R600. As a bonus, non-AA fillrate is also doubled for FP64 (16 bit per component) color formats going from 8 pixels per clock to full 16 pixels per clock."


    read the article to get a better understanding :!
     
  3. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    1,814
  4. AlexV

    AlexV Heteroscedasticitate
    Moderator Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    144
    ATi is better at memory management, currently.
     
  5. apoppin

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hi Desert SoCal
    You are right, Amit. AT's article was actually pretty fair; it is the editor's "comments" that were made that was irritating to some of us - comments that did not necessarilu agree with their own conclusions and benchmarks, as i remember.

    Yep, IQ comparisons were formerly pretty irritating timewise. But you can make FRAPS videos as 'proof' - i use them as the basis for my own comparisons and i have used a digital camera also, when it is tough to see the differences that show up only when the scene is in motion. Some games are also much harder to capture - i have an awful time with BioShock, but Crysis is easy because of the tools built in.

    i also prefer to take my screen shots at a lower resolution as it is just easier to see differences. Then i can retake them at whatever resolution looks best in the shot. Lots and lots of time involved, seems to be the main problem doing IQ reviews.
     
  6. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,119
    Location:
    New York
    But what's the point or usefulness of an IQ comparison that highlights differences nobody would notice at normal resolutions during gameplay? Magnified low-resolution screenshot comparisons ftl.
     
  7. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    Because during gameplay those differences actually stand out even more. Motion causes the jagged edges to appear to "swim". I certainly see it in Oblivion @ 1080P w/HDR & 4xMSAA. Not so bad when you're just standing there looking at something, but start moving (character or camera) and it's noticeable. Then again, I do play on a 42" screen... ;)
     
  8. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,119
    Location:
    New York
    I wasn't referring to artifacts that are more apparent in motion than in screenshots...hence the "during normal gameplay" reference in my post.

    In very few cases I've found screenshot comparisons useful as so many other things are different - brightness, gamma, contrast - that it's impossible to isolate miniscule differences.
     
  9. Mark

    Mark aka Ratchet
    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2002
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Newfoundland, Canada
    I'm not sure if I'm remembering this right, but if you use Fraps to grab your screenshots instead of the built-in HL2 feature it'll grab accurate images... or that could quite possibly be the other way around: if you're using Fraps, use the HL2 thing...

    <offtopic> I used to really enjoy makinmg those AA comparison things. I'd spend hours and hours grabbing screenshots and preparing images in Photoshop then making the javascript apps work in a way so that it was easy to compare images ... check these out:
    http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/nvidia8800/aa.php
    http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/nvidia8800/aa2.php
    </offtopic>
     
  10. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    From what I've seen mentioned elsewhere, it seems to only affect GX2 / SLI cards due to missing SLI profiles.
     
  11. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    Is the driver that TechReport used, "Catalyst 8.501.1-080612a-064906E", the same as the Catalyst HotFix drivers?
     
  12. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    471
    Catalyst 8.5 WHQL [8.493]
    Catalyst 8.6 WHQL [8.500]
    Catalyst Hotfix / Radeon™ HD 4800 Series [8.501.1]
     
  13. AlexV

    AlexV Heteroscedasticitate
    Moderator Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    144
    Yes.
     
  14. Dave Baumann

    Dave Baumann Gamerscore Wh...
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    14,090
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    O Canada!
    Yes, the drivers that were made available to the press were also publically posted as the Hotfix; we made an update to the drivers to include better Crossfire X profiling for Bioshock and The Witcher and the Hotfix was also updated with these profiles.

    The Hotfix largely forms the basis of Cat 8.7 as far as the HD 4850/4870 is concerned.
     
  15. apoppin

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hi Desert SoCal
    i am using the Hotfix drivers [after installing what was on the ooB CD] and this is what my CCC reports:

    However, i am getting some real oddities in my results and i will try 8.6 next, benchmark it, and then rewrite it again with the Hotfix and redo my benches over. 2900xt Crossfire should not get more in 3DMark06 than my 4870, i believe; so something may have gone wrong with my original driver install.

    The hot fix is "beta 8.7", right?

    i didn't go out to that party and i am about to head back to benchmarking-land. i will check back in tomorrow with more sure results. So far i am not terribly impressed with 4870; it is a step up over 8800GTX, however. Now i will go figure it out. i also purchased "Vantage" but have to re-download the Advanced version as it is much larger than the 1-try demo - another 30 hours to go over 56K
    :roll:
     
    #235 apoppin, Jun 29, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 29, 2008
  16. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    Really miss your reviews, Mark. Those IQ comparisons were the best on the net!
     
  17. tuteja1986

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Australia , Sydney
    I know :! you were the ultimate GPU reviewer :( .. damn rage3d owners did crap all with the site. I really wished they had let you buy the site.
     
  18. pharma

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    4,549
    Apparently the "elsewhere" you are referring to is here. Definitely not comments from Nvidia sources.

    However Benchmark_reviews.com did state:

    Which indicates that there were performance hits on the 9800 GTX cards as well, but not the 55% decrease noted in some GX2 benchmarks. The good news is not many review sites used the 175.19's.

    Pharma
     
  19. Broken Hope

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    England
  20. Sound_Card

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Have you read it lately?
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...