Has anyone done a review yet about WHY to upgrade?

Discussion in '3D Hardware, Software & Output Devices' started by digitalwanderer, May 11, 2004.

  1. Veridian3

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    To not have to play anything below 1600x1200 4aa16af now, thats the benefit of a X800 card over the last gen. And at those settings the X800 is/was well worth the money and upgrade as your gaming experience is improved. Its the graphical equivalent of mono/stereo speakers to surround sound - more immersive.

    You do have to have a monitor that can handle that res but if you have a $500 card you should be easily able to afford a decent 19" monitor capable of 1600x1200 and above.
     
  2. Quitch

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    UK
    Upping the resolution used to be the whole point of new cards! I remember when we got a GeForce and bumped Quake III up to 1024x768, or the time I could finally get Unreal up for 800x600 to 1024x768... *drool*

    The resolution and AA/AF numbers being higher are the best thing any new card can bring to the table. New features are nice, but resolution, AA and AF don't rely on any developer support, they just work.

    Oh, and there' the "Almost Temporal" AA which sounds rather nice. Double AA for no speed hit sounds good to me, and the worst that can happen is that the FPS aren't high enough and you still get the good quality AA you based the setting on. Win-win.
     
  3. Catcher

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    To answer your original question, dig, Ace's Hardware usually does their video card reviews in a "what effect would this upgrade have?" format across a fair selection of games. Unfortunately, the guys there don't have the contacts/resources that the big sites or specialty sites (like B3D) have. It may be a bit before they can get such a review out. :(
     
  4. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    Thanks Catcher, hopefully my contacts are better than their contacts and I can beat 'em out with it. ;)
     
  5. rainz

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    i'll upgrade my video card for Far Cry, HL2, Doom 3 and any future monsters.

    RainZ
     
  6. fallguy

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,367
    Likes Received:
    11
    To be honest, the only reason Im upgrading is because of Farcry. I like the game very much, but I cant play at my usual settings, without slow down. I like to use 1280x1024 (my LCD res) with all settings in game set to the highest, max quality on drivers, and usually 4xAA/8xAF. Even with a 4gig P4, 1gig DDR 520@1:1, and a 9800XT@480/420, I got down into the 20's with the same at times. Usually in the 40-50's.. but I cant handle 20's.
     
  7. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    I think any review that includes a 9800XT or 5950U shows why you'd want to upgrade to a X800, no? Here's a brief forum review that shows a pretty dramatic increase in moving from a 9700P to a X800P on an A64 3400+--on Far Cry and Splinter Cell, at least, two titles which seem to demand more from a GPU than most.
     
  8. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    It's the "A64" bit of that review I don't like, I don't really know all that many people who don't work at a tech site who really have 64 bit systems.

    I could be wrong, but I think the mainline enthusiast who ATi is hoping to target right now with their X800 Pro probably has a rig right around what I have. An Abit NF7-s rev2, Barton2500+ (10.5x200), 1GB PC3200, Audigy2 which right now I got a 9700 Pro in and the damned card still runs almost every game great! (Exceptions being FarCry, Halo, DE:IW, and TR:AOD)

    I was wondering if there were any reviews out there done on a more mainstream system such as me own. There is just a HUGE base of installed nForce2 users and Pentium4's of equivelant speed and a whole lot of them like me don't plan to jump on the first generation of PEG boards that come out, we intend to wait until they get nicely established standards and all the bugs worked out just like last time.

    I guess I'm looking for a review on "rusty edge of technology" gaming gear of how the latest generation cards work and what they're bringing to the table.

    It's kind of the angle I'm looking to go for because I never see it covered enough, also because it's about the only one I CAN do. :oops:
     
  9. rainz

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    Thx Pete

    RainZ
     
  10. fallguy

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,367
    Likes Received:
    11
    I think a lot more people have A64's, than you think. Sure, not as much so as the Bartons, yet. They are very popular for gamers, and if you are buying a new AMD setup, its really the only choice. Unless you just dont have the cash, or plan to overclock a -M like crazy. Their lower models are not that expensive. It will be my next setup, just waiting on the 939 change.
     
  11. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    dw, I'm sure you've seen it, but 3DC's benchmarks are done on a P4 2.53GHz FSB533 AGP4x system, probably somewhat similar to yours, and not as "cutting edge" as A64s and FSB800 P4s.

    But you can see that user review I linked is basically CPU-limited at the "lower" resolutions, but the X800 still shows a big framerate increase over the 9700P. He went from 30fps @ 8x6 to 50fps @ 16x12 (!) in FC, and 50fps @ 8x6 to 60fps @ 16x12 in SC. At the very least, you'll pretty much remove the video card as a limiting factor in your system, freeing you up to pine for a faster CPU. ;)
     
  12. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    So I can spend $400us to make me entire system feel obsolet... :|

    ;)
     
  13. Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    6,363
    Likes Received:
    83

    Well there's no point in upgrading to a next-gen graphics card if it's just going to be bottlenecked by the CPU/motherboard/RAM. Especially if you can't transfer the card to your new PEG system in 12 months time.
     
  14. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    At least your good friend Hi Res, AA, and AF will be available to console you. Just try not to shed too many tears into that high-quality water. ;)
     
  15. accidentalsuccess

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    EXACTLY. Never upgrade something as critical as a vid card when an architecture change is on the horizon like this. See how the dust settles. . .


    'course, I have a 9800XT. If I still had my GF3, I'd be thinking hard about the X800. . .
     
  16. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    I got a 9700 pro that I got OCed to 380/360. I've taken it to somewhere over 400 before, but I still got the stock cooler on it and it heats up too quick to do much more than a couple of 3-4 3dm2k3 runs before it starts artifacting a bit.

    But my son is getting into some high-end games now, and I'm really thinking he could use the 9700 pro to replace his GF4ti4400.......

    (Ok, so I'll use ANY justification/rationalization to try and get a bit of shiny-new to play with. :roll: Sue me, it's a weakness-o-mine. ;) )
     
  17. Schuey

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South Florida
    Here are some benches showing the difference in several apps. between my old 9800 Pro and the X800 Pro @ 580/580. If it looks familiar it's because I posted it on a couple other forums this weekend..

    Painkiller (average fps/maximum fps)
    9800: 1024x768 No AA/AF - 259/655
    X800: 1024x768 No AA/AF - 299/660
    9800: 1024x768 4xAA/8xAF - 132/651
    X800: 1024x768 4xAA/8xAF - 263/658
    9800: 1024x768 6xAA/16xAF - 130/494
    X800: 1024x768 6xAA/16xAF - 225/658
    9800: 1280x1024 No AA/AF - 173/534
    X800: 1280x1024 No AA/AF - 272/655
    9800: 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF - 93/484
    X800: 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF - 207/649
    9800: 1280x1024 6xAA/16xAF - 54/276
    X800: 1280x1024 6xAA/16xAF - 172/654
    At max settings the X800 is more than 3X as fast!

    Quake 3 (average fps)
    9800: 1024x768 No AA/AF - 283
    X800: 1024x768 No AA/AF - 282
    9800: 1024x768 4xAA/8xAF - 241
    X800: 1024x768 4xAA/8xAF - 278
    9800: 1024x768 6xAA/16xAF - 197
    X800: 1024x768 6xAA/16xAF - 278
    9800: 1280x1024 No AA/AF - 265
    X800: 1280x1024 No AA/AF - 277
    9800: 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF - 167
    X800: 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF - 268
    9800: 1280x1024 6xAA/16xAF - 130
    X800: 1280x1024 6xAA/16xAF - 248
    Even at the maximum settings and maximum rez on my monitor, the card is not stressed at all.

    Code Creatures (average fps/millions of polygons)
    9800: 1280x1024 No AA - 38.6/14.6
    X800: 1280x1024 No AA - 68.2/24.6
    9800: 1280x1024 2x AA - 33.4/12.8
    X800: 1280x1024 2x AA - 59.2/22.6
    9800: 1280x1024 4x AA - 22.0/9.5
    X800: 1280x1024 4x AA - 47.3/19.8
    I set the AA thru the app. here so I didn't use AF. At max settings, more than double the performance here.

    3D Mark '01 (high quality in the control panel)
    9800 Pro - 18,387
    X800 Pro - 20,955
    3D Mark '03 (high quality in the control panel)
    9800 Pro - 5905
    X800 Pro - 10869

    Now I am going to show you the 3D Mark scores that you should be shown. Unfortunately I'm limited to 1024x768 as I didn't purchase '03.

    3D Mark '03 @ 6xAA/16xAF - 9800 Pro
    Score - 2106
    GT1 (Wings of Fury) - 89.3
    GT2 (Battle of Proxycon) - 8.8
    GT3 (Troll's Lair) - 8.7
    GT4 (Mother Nature) - 18.6
    Fillrate (Single-Texturing) - 1258.3
    Fillrate (Multi-Texturing) - 2863
    Vertex Shader - 17.4
    Pixel Shader 2.0 - 30.3
    Ragtroll - 4.7

    3D Mark '03 @ 6xAA/16xAF - X800 Pro
    Score - 4926
    GT1 (Wings of Fury) - 178.0
    GT2 (Battle of Proxycon) - 22.0
    GT3 (Troll's Lair) - 20.8
    GT4 (Mother Nature) - 47.4
    Fillrate (Single-Texturing) - 2073.7
    Fillrate (Multi-Texturing) - 6269.4
    Vertex Shader - 37.1
    Pixel Shader 2.0 - 68.6
    Ragtroll - 11.8
     
  18. Diplo

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    UK
    Press tilde for console then type \r_displayinfo 1 to turn on and change to 0 to turn off.
     
  19. grimreefer

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    the nvidia cards have bettr af quality than the x800 because they dont use cheats
     
  20. Eronarn

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, what an excellent first post. You'll do fine here! :roll:
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...