[H]: Benchmarking Future

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Ante P, Jun 23, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ante P

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDkxLDE=

    I certainly agree with the fact that a more varied set of games should be used for evaluating videocards and that Synthetic benchmarks might not be indictive of future technology gaming.

    But the whole article to me kinda gives me the impression that Kyles idea of handling the situation is bending over and taking it up the batty.

    I mean, instead of just accepting "optimizations" and the move towards "console type setups" where you'll eventually need a specific vendors hardware to render a game people like Kyle and all other people who "have a say" should stand up and "fight".
    A united press that won't condone, well ok, cheating and hardware specific game titles can help out to diminish them.

    If not then Kyle has just signed his own tombstone, what's the point of writing a single word if he's taking for granted that nobody is listening anyways?
     
  2. Evildeus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,657
    Likes Received:
    2
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...