Fallout 4 [PS4, XO]

Discussion in 'Console Gaming' started by DSoup, Jun 2, 2015.

  1. iroboto

    iroboto Daft Funk
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    14,838
    Likes Received:
    18,641
    Location:
    The North
    Yea that makes sense to me. Rental sounds like a good thing to try out. I'm usually not too into open world (I prefer structure to a game, I generally like games where I'm not playing sim life, but something that is looking to either advance a narrative, or purposefully challenge me), but I figured it's important for me to try some of these larger titles. Assassin's Creed Black Flag was actually my first AssCreed. I followed up with their hacking game and couldn't help but feel it was the same game in a different environment.
     
    Billy Idol likes this.
  2. RenegadeRocks

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,110
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    The game has gone gold and there is lterally no footage except the reveal ??? I mean show us some quest, some perks in action stuff like that. How am I to know if the ideas of the devs have translated into a good game? Where is the dev walkthroughs showing multiple possibilities? :-/
     
  3. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    Bethesda have been releasing the S.P.E.C.I.A.L videos every Wednesday so I would expect something tomorrow in lieu of the run of those being complete. But even if they don't show more (and I would be surprised given the videos we saw of Skyrim before release) you can wait for the reviews or wait for opinions and shared footage of others who have played it. :yep2: Live from PlayStation is really good for this.

    I'm not sure videos from the developer/publisher will be more beneficial than reviews, the latter are for the most part independent whereas an official gameplay video is not going to show you anything that isn't super polished. Past Bethesda Game Studio review embargos have lifted the day before release.
     
    RenegadeRocks likes this.
  4. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    Fallout 4 – Big Leagues Perk



    There are over 200 distinct perk/ranks. Well played, Bethesda. :yep2:
     
  5. RenegadeRocks

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,110
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    no proper quest footage, no dialogue trees, multiple choices and effects. Bland marketing.
     
  6. Clukos

    Clukos Bloodborne 2 when?
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    4,688
    Likes Received:
    4,353
  7. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    I've seen more marketing for Fallout 4 in London than I have for Halo 5 of Star Wars Battlefront. Hell, I've seen more marketing for the Nathan Drake Collection as well! I guess you're not getting stuff like this where you live.

    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    #147 DSoup, Oct 31, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2015
    RenegadeRocks likes this.
  8. Newguy

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2014
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    122
  9. Clukos

    Clukos Bloodborne 2 when?
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    4,688
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    It's their engine, pretty much the same engine frankensteined to support PBR and some modern rendering techniques. Pretty sure the game will be awesome but they need to upgrade their engine or optimize it for 60 fps imo.
     
  10. Billy Idol

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6,067
    Likes Received:
    907
    Location:
    Europe
    I wonder if these graphics positively influences the actual power consumption of the consoles while playing FO4....maybe a bit more than in rest mode?
     
  11. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    I couldn't disagree more. The parts of the engine they most need to have improved is the AI, scripting, collision detection and physics because this is what is most important to 99% of moment to moment gameplay.

    Fallout 4 is an RPG which lets you explore, shoot, build, craft and build big piles of 50,000 cans. Plus anything else a maniac can imagine wanting to do. The engine is built around these things working well and the graphics engine needs to accommodate people wanting to do weird shit like that. Graphics are the least important thing to the majority of people who will actually play the game.

    Bethesda could definitely have prioritised graphics but needing to support consoles meant they would have had to pair back other things and then it's not really a Fallout game any more. How many game engines out there have to deal with the player potentially doing anything like stacking thousands of bodies, body parts or items up without the engine and framerate falling to pieces?

    For anybody who has forgotten this is what Fallout 3 looked like on 360.

    [​IMG]
     
    #151 DSoup, Oct 31, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2015
    RenegadeRocks likes this.
  12. Clukos

    Clukos Bloodborne 2 when?
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    4,688
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Witcher 3 is an RPG too and it looks almost a generational leap ahead of FO4 on consoles. I am not saying they have to improve the graphics, just move to 60 fps with the very same or similar graphics (optimize the engine basically instead of revamping it) and call it a day.
     
  13. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    The Witcher 3 is an RPG (and a great one at that) but it does not let you destroy and create new environments or move any of the million objects the game world so the game designers know the graphics budget of most scenes because they are static environments. Fallout and Elder Scrolls games are not like this so the engine that has to accommodate the user potentially wanting to do anything at all.

    That is HUGE.

    edit: Also figure that every NPC model in the game has layered armour so they've not just endless identical models with the same textures. You look at the game and sure, it's a long way from what The Witcher looks like, but what you don't see are the details. The things Fallout 4 is doing and I expect we won't get a full appreciation of this until the reviews are out.
     
    #153 DSoup, Oct 31, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2015
  14. Clukos

    Clukos Bloodborne 2 when?
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    4,688
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Or until we actually play the game :smile:
     
    DSoup likes this.
  15. ultragpu

    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    6,242
    Likes Received:
    2,306
    Location:
    Australia
    It's almost offensive how ugly these FO4 shots look, are people seriously ok with this kind of graphics treatment? I remember FO3 back then despite not the best looking, is still a pretty decent looking console title.
     
  16. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    I don't claim to speak for everybody but the vibe in the fallout community is that the visuals are a big step up from Fallout 3 on consoles and people are very much looking forward to playing the game.

    B3D is a microcosm in gaming because there is much scrutiny over visuals but almost nobody is discussing gameplay. This is a site for graphics whores more than gamers.

    BGS titles give you unprecedented amounts of freedom to interact the game world where physics are applied to everything so it was never going to look as good as games which don't do these things and that's pretty much every other game apart from Elder Scrolls and Fallout. Anybody who expected it to look like the Witcher or GTA were setting themselves up for a fall.

    Some people get it, others do not.

    And as someone who played Fallout 3 and New Vegas on PS3, while it has its moments, it had a lot of rough edges - all side effects of decisions to give player freedom.
     
    #156 DSoup, Nov 1, 2015
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2015
    iroboto likes this.
  17. DJ12

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,105
    Likes Received:
    198
    having recently played through fallout 3 and new Vegas with hd re-texture mods installed running a solid 1080p60 on my pc I can tell you fallout 4 looks considerably better than those games.

    It may not look as good as some other games out there right now but lets not get ridiculous about it.
     
    iroboto and RenegadeRocks like this.
  18. ultragpu

    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    6,242
    Likes Received:
    2,306
    Location:
    Australia
    Yeah I do realize their priority in making the game but it makes me wonder is it really important to sacrifice so much visuals in order to just pick up a rock, a chair or cut down a random tree branch? I personally don't find it immersive to do what FO4 allows you to do while bathed in well below average looking graphics. It's like you are on this beach resort for holiday where almost everything is free, free food, parking, accommodation etc, but the beach itself is polluted as hell, water is murky, sand is dirty, dead palm trees, a rotten carcass of a whale, freezing weather etc. Is this an experience people would rather enjoy? Yes, some games thrive on game mechanics like minecraft, pokemon, dota, diablo, but there's absolutely no reason why half way decent graphics shouldn't be an important factor of a Fallout game. It's just those FO supporters have never seen a FO game with The Witcher like graphics on top of its core gameplay mechanics, once they've seen it, they sure as hell would not go back. Bethesda is jsut so cheap they wouldn't invest the extra cash on a more up to date engine and fans are blindly supporting them, that's what disgusts me so bad.
     
  19. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    12,721
    Location:
    London, UK
    You are not the target audience and that's totally cool, there are other RPGs out there for you. Bethesda have been making games like this for 20 years and they sell millions of copies have a cabinet full go GOTY awards.

    For the record, stealing all the cans and building a giant pyramid out of them isn't my thing either but I've been seemingly blessed to thoroughly enjoy games with great gameplay regardless of the graphics, resolution or framerate. I consider myself lucky given how many other people see to find this a barrier to enjoyment, it just means some people will be missing out on a lot of good games.

    Apparently you've not played a Bethesda game on PC with mods applied. If you want performance at any price the PC version is right there but we're in the console thread here.

    As for gameplay mechanics, the Witcher 3 offers you a choice of combat mechanics (strong/agile melee, ranged, potions and magic) using which you can vary the way you murder and kill your way through the game's story with just a few instances where you have the scope not to murder and kill everything. There are choices throughout the main quest which give you an illusion of choice but which really only affect story slides at the end, they don't meaningfully change the game world.

    Fallout also offers you a very wide range of combat but also a dizzying array of non-combat skills which means you can tackle most quests exactly how you like. You have melee and ranged weapons, you have conventional guns, energy weapons and explosives. You have stealth, you have traps, you can talk your way into places and out of problems. There are a lot of combat and non-combat options. There are choices though the main quest which materially change the game world, such as in Fallout 3 where you chose to destroy the hub town Megaton. New Vegas offers factions vying for power and your decisions will shape the game world.

    They're very different games and very different in scope because in the Witcher you're a witcher and in Fallout you're anybody you want to be. Freedom.

    Ok, I don't know what more to say here short of repeating myself. Bethesda have a different goal with their RPGs than CD Projekt Red which I've explained above and which you seem to have trouble accepting. Commercially, Bethesda's games are more successful than CD Projekt Red. It's a fact, more people play and buy them which should tell you that the formula is popular. I enjoy both, I prefer the freedom of playing very, very different ways - not just will I cat armour build with swords and potions, or wolf armour build with swords, bombs and magic - because it's still mostly hack and slash.

    In terms of the engine I really don't know what to tell you. Bethesda's engine has a bad reputation and some of this is warranted but a lot of it, in my view, is unwarranted and put forth by people who have never written a line or code let alone written or used a game engine. Bethesda are very nice in that they make some engine development tools (like G.E.C.K) available for modders and those who just want to muck around.

    It's tiresome reading endless comparisons between Gamebryo/Creation and other engines running different games with oblivious disregard that those other games are not doing a fraction of what Bethesda's games are doing. Graphics are not the be all and end all of immersion. You want to compare them, fine but first let's load down this other game and its engine with the flexibility of gameplay that Fallout offers and oh don't forget that objects are no longer states models, they have their own properties and can be moved around and physics applies to everything. Oh this other game is now running like shit? What a surprise! Writing an engine has to deal with anything the player can imagine, then actually do, is hard. It's why Bethesda games can be glitchy because there are very few rules which make QA very, very difficult.

    I expect nonsense like this on GAF (read this thread - you'll probably love it) but not on a 'technical forum' where so many developers post. :(
     
    iroboto likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...