Creative claims similar shadowing tech as id Software

Discussion in 'Beyond3D News' started by Reverend, Jul 28, 2004.

  1. Reverend

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,266
    Creative apparently has a patent on a shadowing technique that appears to have some similiarity with id Software's soon-to-be-available DOOM3's shadowing technique (story). Now, without attempting to raise any controversy on this matter, this reporter thinks that software patents in general are a Bad Thing. It is a little suspicious that Creative posted about their technique on their company's developer forum first. To have later filed a patent and then challenge id Software is in this reporter's opinion inexcusable. This is tantamount to blackmailing game developers -- inventing a technique, talking about it before filing a patent that hasn't been published and then telling a game developer that there is some infringement is just unethical behaviour.

    [edit]It is wise to visit this page to see some history behind Creative's claim. But this does not change the basic opinion this reporter has about the gist of this matter. Please visit the comments on this news post.

    This reporter emailed id Software's John Carmack, touching a little on his "reverse shadowing" technique (info here and here) and the state of patenting in general before asking him for some comments on this Creative "agreement" with id Software. Here's what he had to say :<blockquote>The patent situation well and truly sucks.

    We were prepared to use a two-pass algorithm that gave equivalent results at a speed hit, but we negotiated the deal with Creative so that we were able to use the zfail method without having to actually pay any cash. It was tempting to take a stand and say that our products were never going to use any advanced Creative/3dlabs products because of their position on patenting gaming software algorithms, but that would only have hurt the users.

    John Carmack
    </blockquote>It appears that id Software "backed down" by resolving this quickly in order not to hurt the gaming industry (including gamers). For a company that is tied so closely with gaming, Creative's actions is just plain wrong. It would be awful to think that this matter is setting a precedent for others to follow Creative's behaviour.

    [Edited – 29/7/2004 13:14 by DB] The Inquirer approached Creative about this story and they have posted Creative's full reply here. Note that we are not suggesting Creative were doing anything other than protecting their IP in relation to the deal struck with id in relation to Doom3, however the concerns voiced here stem from the shadowing solution apparently being evangelised to games developers at a Creative Developer Conference before the patent was filed.

    [Edited – 1/8/2004 by Reverend]Just after the original news post, this reporter contacted Mr Sim Dietrich at NVIDIA about the contents of our news post. The following is Mr Dietrich's email to this reporter :<blockquote>I really shouldn't comment on the legal or moral aspects of it, but I updated my post on Gamedev.net about this just to set the facts straight.

    Basically, I actually presented it even earlier, at GDC in March '99 in my 'Using the Stencil Buffer' Talk.
    </blockquote>
     
  2. Johnny Rotten

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    327
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I absolutely detest creative. It PAINS me that there isnt a viable competitor (as far as a quality gaming soundboard goes) in the consumer space. If nvidia would just license or release their nforce APU I would mail my audigy ZS back to creative headquarters in peices.
     
  3. kyleb

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,165
    thanks for following up on this Rev, i though creative's pr comment seemed rather fishy.

    oh and i too think that nvidia should go into the sound card business, given their close ties with the top teer developers like id i think they could really put a hurt on creative's current monopoly.
     
  4. Anonymous

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 12, 1978
    Messages:
    3,263
    Yeah, there was hope for awhile. I was hoping that Audigy would be the "3dfx" of the audio industry and provide viable competition for creative plus some innovation, instead Creative killed them off. The sad thing is, Intel might be able to kill Creative off, but then we're stuck with an Intel monopoly on audio, and without any innovative standard to differentiate and expand on, like "Wavetracing" ala Audigy, audio becomes commodified and there just isn't a reason to purchase an external card anymore. It'll be hacked up EAX-style reverb and occlusions rather than something more physically simulated.
     
  5. kyleb

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,165
    i think you mean "Aureal" there, "Audigy" is what Creative calls their newer cards.
     
  6. MfA

    MfA
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    5,718
    Just a small caveat, Sim Dietrich did a presentation in 1999 on a simular method ... which was at a Creative Labs developer forum apparently, but not presented by Creative themselves.

    More details in this thread at Gamedev. You might want to add that link to the news post for clarification. Also it might be nice to get some additional comments from mr. Dietrich, at the time he made those comments he was not aware of them going after developers ... he might have some more choice words now.

    BTW I would like to commend B3D for taking the time and having the guts to get the ball rolling, and mr. Carmack for his remarkable forthrightness.
     
  7. Reverend

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,266
    Marco, who did Dietrich work for at the during he made the presentation? Can't locate his email add... do you have it? (PM me)
     
  8. Cryect

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    674
    http://developer.nvidia.com/attach/1807

    There is his presentation with his email address at the time. He worked at that time for Nvidia (so suprisingly enough his email address is SDietrich at some place nvidia.com).

    Edit:
    Good job btw Reverand on getting Carmack's comments which confirm our fears.
     
  9. MfA

    MfA
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    5,718
    Well in the presentation on NVIDIA's site from around the same time he had a nvidia email address. Interestingly the presentation while present seems no longer linked anywhere on NVIDIA's site.

    He actively posts on gamedev, and has simmer@spies.net set there. I think he is still at NVIDIA though (hope they wont prevent him from commenting :( ) so SDietrich@nvidia.com might also work.
     
  10. Richard

    Richard Mord's imaginary friend
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,508
    Location:
    PT, EU
    /me crosses off Audigy 2 from his list of planned upgrades.

    Reverend, excellent work. It's nice to see that you want to pursue this. I hope this issue is picked up tomorrow on the mainstream gaming sites.
     
  11. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    4,708
    Apparently Mr. Dietrich posted in that GD thread:

     
  12. demalion

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Location:
    CT
    I've ranked Creative pretty low for quite some time, but I'd thought that at least 3D graphics was somewhat safe from them. I'd also thought that the 3Dlabs acquistion might have a positive effect on some aspects of their management.

    Unfortunate surpises today, it seems.
     
  13. Anonymous

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 12, 1978
    Messages:
    3,263
    Tough argument there.

    When a AAA-publisher, not to mention one of the industries brightest and most respected programmers, publicly refuses to use patented gaming software alogrithms, this stands a good chance of lessening the influence of patent extortionists like Creative. This is even more the case considering the number of games which will use the Doom 3 license in the coming years.

    -Blue
     
  14. Reverend

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,266
    Sent the following to SDietrich@nvidia.com and simmers@spies.net (thanks Marco) :

     
  15. Reverend

    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,266
    The truth is I hate this as much as you, Marco. Dave doesn't like B3D staff to be sensationalists (it's unprofessional and at times just plain immature... some websites likes to do this to generate hits and hopefully get noticed) and while this is a particularly sensitive issue and I didn't consult Dave about making this news post of mine, the underlying nature of this matter is too serious for me to not make some noise.

    The fact that I told John that I hate this, will want to speak out about this and will use whatever comments he may provide and he gave me that remarkably (in your words) frank reply basically means I have the "go ahead".

    In my correspondences with various devs, we share knowledge freely, exchanging ideas. The fact (unknown to all, coz I don't see the need to spill it) that some of my software workarounds for problems (99% performance related) that these devs encountered (that they tell me) actually gets into their games is good enough for me. OK, such incidences are low but that's not the point. Or maybe the whole point. I dunno. This is both frustrating and disturbing.
     
  16. Waltar

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    130
    Location:
    trapped inside Jen-Hsun Huang's basement
    Creative is literally the mob of the pc world. I've never seen strong arming and downright blackmail. They're the reason I will never upgrade my Game Theatre xp soundcard. I'd rather die then download 200 meg drivers for a soundcard that doesn't work properly.
     
  17. Rasmoo

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42
    And I really don't like broccoli. ;) (Well, actually, that's a lie - I love my broccoli).

    Are you sure about this (and the wording)? Afaik, if a certain technique has been described in a publicly accessible medium (e.g. the newspaper), it can't be patented. At least, it's a well known way of preventing others from patenting something, which you don't wish to patent yourself. Maybe bboards don't count...

    On a more general note, however, I am a little uhm uneasy with frontpage news like this, because what you appear to do is to question the "morale" of a company and/or make a political statement. As far as I am concerned, companies are free to choose any strategy, as long as they respect existing legislation.
     
  18. bloodbob

    bloodbob Trollipop
    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Australia
    In my books you've done enough. I think the community will try to do the rest ( I wonder how many people contacted www.planetdoom.com before they posted about this ).

    I really hope the FTA with the US doesn't go through for australia or we will have to put up with this stuff down under :/
     
  19. Bouncing Zabaglione Bros.

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    6,363
    If the likes of ID are not going to take a stand, then no one is going to. Until someone challenges this patent in the courts, Creative get their own way and everyone will just buckle under to Creative's strong-arm tactics.

    Once again the US patent office shows it's inability to do it's job properly.
     
  20. davefb

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    manchester- UK
    checkout 'fast and robust shadowvolumes' as well from the nvidia site. it mentions this , "B. Bilodeau and M. Songy, talk at Creative Labs Inc. sponsored game developer conference, Los Angeles, May 1999." , i dont know if that was the GDC talk that sam gave ? It also talks about the flaws in this algorithm. So did JC amend the algorithm so it would "work", if so then surely the creative issue is moot?

    -dave-
    [edit] . can't have been can it.. gdc is march, *nice* wonder what this other talk was ? E3?
    [edit]
    it's mentioned here in the references
    http://www.gamedev.net/columns/hardcore/shadowvolume/page5.asp

    [7]: Bilodeau, Bill and Mike Songy. "Real Time Shadows", Creativity 1999, Creative Labs Inc. Sponsored game developer conferences, Los Angeles, California, and Surrey, England, May 1999.
     

Share This Page

Loading...